LUQ LTER DATA SETS DOCUMENTATION FORM
ON-LINE VERSION
A DATA SET is a series of observations collected by the same methodology. Each data set should have documentation sufficient for someone unfamiliar with the research to replicate the study. Data sets may be broken into subsets (data files) that are discrete in space and time, in that order. The documentation for a data set should include all spatial and temporal subdivisions of the data.
(Data, Abstract, Methods, Variables)
NOTES:
PERSON(S) COMPLETING THIS FORM: E-MAIL ADDRESS:
|
Lars Walker
|
|
|
Alejandra Riaño |
|
|
Eda C. Meléndez-Colom |
DATA SET IDENTIFIER: Soil Characteristics of Landslides
PROJECT TITLE: Landslide Revegetation Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landslide are among the most severe rainforest disturbances (Garwood et al. 1979, Hubbell & Foster 1986, Sousa 1984, Waide & Lugo 1992, Walker et al. in press), generating extreme abiotic spatial gradients (Fernández & Myster 1995) and exposing soil and parent material (Guariguata 1990). Landslides contain patches of vegetation surrounded by a matrix of soil or bare substrate (Dalling 1994, Myster & Fernández 1995). In addition, they often undergo recurrent localized disturbance either by resliding or by treefall at the edge of the landslide (Hartshorn 1980), thereby adding new plant preopagules, soil or organic material after the initial slippage. These landslide feature, coupled with interactions between patches of similar soil or vetetation (including seed dispersal, shading, litter deposition and vegetative reproduction), strongly suggets that landslide are a patch-dynamic system (Hupp 1983, Pickett & White 1985).
Changes in the composition and abundance of species within these patches over space and time can be considered successional pathways (Austin 1977, Myster & Pickett 1990). Analysis of the pathways can indicate (i) spatial and temporal variation in initial species richness and rate of species turnover (Myster & Pickett 1994), (ii) important species that define pathways and may suggest key regeneration strategies, (iii) community convergence or divergence, and (iv) the effects of past history and land-use (Myster &Pickett 1990, 1994).
Here we use permanent plot data sampled from 16 landslide to documents temporal successional pathways in landslide patches (without the use of a chronosequence, cf. Guariguata 1990) and address the following questions: (1) What are the successional pathways of landslide and what species define them ? How much pathway variation of individual plots is there within these landslides ? (2) How similar are pathways among landslide ? Is there any evidence that, with time, landslides either converge to a common vegetative enpoint or slow in the rate of successional change?
LTER CORE AREAS: (Annotate all that apply)
|
Primary Productivity & Populations |
LEF LTER 1 RESEARCH TOPIC: (Annotate all that apply)
| 2b. Nutrient Storage. |
| 2c. Soil organic matter formation |
|
Data File No. |
Data File Identifier |
On-Line Filename |
Starting Date |
Periodicity of sample |
End Period |
|
1 |
INTENSIVE ES-1 Soil data |
6/3/88 |
once |
6/3/88 |
|
|
2 |
INTENSIVE ES-2 Soil data |
10/25/88 |
once |
10/25/88 |
|
|
3 |
INTENSIVE RB-2 Soil data |
1/1/89 |
once |
10/25/88 |
|
|
4 |
Soil factors in ES2 and RB2 microhabitats | SoilfactorsinES2andRB2microhabitats.txt | 10/25/88 | once | 10/25/88 |
INVESTIGATORS:
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS E-MAIL address
| D.J. Lodge | DJLodge@coqui.net |
|
Lars Walker
|
|
|
B. Haines |
|
|
X. Zou |
|
|
R. Myster |
CONTACT PERSONS E-MAIL address Phone Number (Include area code)
|
Lars Walker
|
(702)895-3399 |
|
|
D. Jean Lodge
|
DJLodge@coqui.net |
(787)889-7445 |
SOURCE OF FUNDING (SPONSOR): LTER - NSF
DATA SET ABSTRACT: Analysis of soil nutrients in top 9 cm of soil in Landslide Revegetation Plots.
DATA SET METHODS: (See protocol)
REFERENCES:
CROSS-REFERENCES (other data sets related to this one):LTERDBAS
15 (Revegetation of landslides, vegetation 0.1 m), LTERDBAS
18 (Revegetation of landslides, vegetation 1.0 m) , and LTERDBAS
36 (Landslide revegetation measurements)
SAMPLE LOCATION: ES – 1 are lost (R. Myster office) and B. Haines
STORAGE SITES (of data files): Data Management File Cabinet DM-001 Drawers #2 & 3
INVESTIGATOR'S ASSIGNED KEYWORDS: nutrient availability, bulk density of soils, landslides
LEF LTER OFFICIAL KEYWORDS (See table): LANDSLIDE PLOTS, DISTURBANCE, SOILS, HIGHER PLANTS, PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL
PUBLICATIONS:
1. ESA 1991 abstract D.J. Lodge and F. Calderón
2. Third European Conference on Mycrhizea Sheffield England, September, 1991.
3. F. Calderón Master Thesis UPR Spring 1992.
DISSEMINATION: UNRESTRICTED
REASONS TO RESTRICT DATA IN THIS DATA SET BEYOND ITS TWO YEAR POLICY PERIOD*:
*WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY LTER PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: J. ZIMMERMAN, A. LUGO , D.J. LODGE
FILING
___ "File" copy only : Data Management will only file an electronic
copy of the data file and its documentation
_X__ "Enter" data on-line : Data Management will be in charge of entering
the data on computer files (ContactEda C. Meléndez)
SITES DESCRIPTIONS:Each of the extensive and intensive landslides in which we are studying revegetation in the LTER has plots 2x5 m distributed along transect lines at 10 m intervals from the upper lip of the slide. The intensive slides (ES-1, ES-2 and RB-2) have 24 plots each, with a 2x1 m seedling subplot along the lower edge of the plot. The extensive slides have various numbers of plots, and there are no seedling subplots within them.
Geographical positional system (GPS) Coordinates for each location:
|
location |
latitude |
longitude |
|
Espiritu Santo 1 (ES-1) landslide plot |
||
|
Espiritu Santo 2 (ES-2) landslide plot |
||
|
Rio Blanco 2 (RB-2) landslide plot |
| FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1, 2, 3 |
1, 2, 3 |
1 |
1 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Landslide |
Tr/Pl/Side |
Bulkdensity |
PPMPHOS |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Landslide name (abbreviated) |
Transect-Plot-Side |
Bulk density |
Phosphorus (parts per million) |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Name of the landslide using the first letter of each word and the assigned number of the landslide |
#of decimeter from the top of the slide-# meters from L side of slide facing uphill-Left & Right side of plot |
Dry weight of soil(1) in core sample per volume of the core(2) in cubic cm |
Olsen-extractableP on air dry soil |
|
UNIT |
N/A |
N/A |
g / cm3 |
Ppm |
|
PRECISION |
N/A |
N/A |
.001 |
.1 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
ES1 = Espiritu Santo 1, |
T= TR = {1-6}, |
||
|
DATA TYPE |
Alphanumeric |
Alphanumeric |
Decimal |
Decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
none |
none |
none |
None |
Observations:(1)Dry weight of soil
= [Weight of small rocks * (Total Initial Fresh Weight - (Weight
of large rocks + Fresh Weight of roots))] ¸ [Weight of soil subsample]2
* [Net dry weight of finely seived soil / Net wet weight of finely seived soil
placed into the drying oven]
(2)Volume of the core is V = pi * r2
* depth, where pi = 3.14 and depth = 9 cm
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
| FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
P/msq |
Ca(ppm) |
Mg(ppm) |
Na (ppm) |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Phosphorus (per meter square) |
Calcium (parts per million) |
Magnesium (parts per million) |
Sodium (parts per million) |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Calculated P availability per square meters |
|||
|
UNIT |
g / m2 |
ppm |
ppm |
Ppm |
|
PRECISION |
.001 |
.01 |
.01 |
.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||
|
DATA TYPE |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
None |
None |
None |
None |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
| FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
K (ppm) |
Al (ppm) |
CICE (ppm) |
Org Mat wt (g) |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Potassium (parts per million) |
Aluminium (parts per million) |
Cation exchange capacity |
Wood and Organic matter |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Weight of wood or organic matter |
|||
|
UNIT |
Ppm |
Ppm |
Ppm |
g |
|
PRECISION |
.01 |
.01 |
.01 |
.001 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||
|
DATA TYPE |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
|
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
None |
None |
None |
blank |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
| FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
1, 2, 3 |
2, 3 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Fresh Weight (gr) |
Large Rocks (gr) |
Roots wt (g) - 1, Fresh Weight of roots (gr) -2, 3 |
Dry Weight of roots (gr) |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Total Initial Fresh Weight |
Weight of large rocks |
Fresh Weight of roots |
Dry Weight of roots |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
weight of the entire soil core fresh |
Weight of large rocks removed on the 4-5 mm mesh seive |
fresh weight of roots |
dry weight of roots |
|
UNIT |
g |
g |
g |
g |
|
PRECISION |
.01 |
.01 |
.01 |
.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||
|
DATA TYPE |
decimal |
decimal |
decimal |
Decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
| FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Soil subsample (~100 gr) |
Small rocks (gr) |
Weight of finely sieved soil (gr) |
Total N (%) |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Weight of soil subsample |
Weight of small rocks |
Weight of finely sieved soil (gr) |
Total Nitrogen percent |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
weight of soil subsample (ca. 100g) put on the 2mm mesh seive |
weight of rocks remaining on the fine (2 mm mesh) seive |
Weight of finely sieved soil placed in tube for extraction of N with KCL (about 4 g) |
|
|
UNIT |
(~100 g) |
g |
g |
Percent |
|
PRECISION |
.01 |
.01 |
.01 |
10E-8 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||
|
DATA TYPE |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
blank |
blank |
blank |
blank |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in whichthe variable appears) |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
2, 3 |
||||||||
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) | Total C (%) |
Sample weight (g) |
Extract P (mg/L) |
Sample P (%) |
||||||||
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Total Carbon percent |
Weight of sample |
Extract Phosphorus |
Sample Phosphorus percent |
||||||||
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
||||||||||||
|
UNIT |
Percent |
g |
mg/L |
Percent |
||||||||
|
PRECISION |
10E-7 |
.0001 |
.0001 |
.0001 |
||||||||
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||||||||||
|
DATA TYPE |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
||||||||
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
Blank |
blank |
blank |
Blank |
||||||||
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in whichthe variable appears) |
2, 3 |
4 | 4 | 4 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Sample P (%) |
Microsite | Landslide | Transect |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Sample Phosphorus |
Microsite | Landslide | Transect |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Percent of phosphorus in sample | Location in landslide | Landslide from which sample of soil was extracted | Transect on the landslide from which sample of soil was extracted |
|
UNIT |
N/A |
N/A | N/A | N/A |
|
PRECISION |
.0001 |
N/A | N/A | N/A |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
Center Forest Landslide Forest border Landslide border |
ES1 ES2 |
1, 2, 3 | |
|
DATA TYPE |
Decimal |
Alphabetic | Alphanumeric | integer |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
none |
none | none | none |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in whichthe variable appears) |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) | P | N | C | M |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Phosphorus concentration in dry soil |
Nitrogen concentration in dry soil | total carbon concentration |
soil moisture percentage |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
total phosphorus (P) concentrations in dry soil in kg/m2 to 9 cm depth |
total nitrogen (N) concentrations in dry soil in kg/m2 to 9 cm depth | total carbon (C) concentrations in dry soil in kg/m2 to 9 cm |
soil moisture (M) percentage of dry weight |
|
UNIT |
kg/m2 | kg/m2 | kg/m2 | |
|
PRECISION |
.001 | .001 | .001 | |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||
|
DATA TYPE |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Decimal |
Integer |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
none |
none |
none |
none |
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS:
|
Variable Name |
Formula |
|
Dry weight of soil |
See Observation (1) above |
|
Volume of the core |
See Observation (2) above |
FOR DATA MANAGER USE ONLY
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
May 15, 2006
DATE OF LAST ENTRY:
STAGE OF DATA SET MANAGEMENT (dates):
RECEIVED ENTERED: 2/5/92
FILED ON-LINE REVIEWED BY RESEARCHER: Oct 2000
FILING MEDIA:
NAME OF DOCUMENTATION FILE : lterdb7.htm
NAME OF ON - LINE CATALOG : LTERDBAS
RECORD #: 7
DOCUMENT TYPE:Data
PRIORITY TO BE ENTERED: Third
Rev. date of this form: 15 July 2001