LUQ LTER DATA SETS DOCUMENTATION FORM
ON-LINE VERSION
A DATA SET is a series of observations collected by the same methodology. Each data set should have documentation sufficient for someone unfamiliar with the research to replicate the study. Data sets may be broken into subsets (data files) that are discrete in space and time, in that order. The documentation for a data set should include all spatial and temporal subdivisions of the data.
(Data, Abstract, Methods, Variables)
NOTES:
PERSON(S) COMPLETING THIS FORM: E-MAIL ADDRESS:
|
Whendee Silver |
DATA SET IDENTIFIER: Patterns in soil and physical properties of the Bisley Watersheds 1 and 2 (Big Dig 1988, Big Dig 1990)
PROJECT TITLE: Soil Nutrient Dynamics in Bisley
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Soils and forest floor were sampled quantitatively from a montane wet tropical forest in Puerto Rico to determine the spatial variability of soil nutrients, the factors controlling nutrient availability, and the distribution of nutrients in soils and plants following Hurricane Hugo
LTER CORE AREAS: (Annotate all that apply)
| Inorganic Inputs and Nutrient Movement |
| Organic Matter Accumulation |
|
Disturbance Patterns |
LEF LTER 1 RESEARCH TOPIC: (Annotate all that apply)
| Recovery after disturbance |
| Environmental monitoring |
|
Disturbance regime |
We define a data file as a component of a data set. A data set can
have only one data file or more. Basically, different data files have different
data structures or format.
DATA SET FILES (SUBSETS):
|
Data File No. |
Data File Identifier |
On-Line Filename |
Starting Date |
Periodicity of sample |
End Period |
| 1 | Soil chemical and physical properties (1988) | BigDigdata88.txt |
June 1988
|
once
|
July 1988
|
| 2 | Effects of Hurricane Hugo on soil chemical and physical properties (Big Dig 1990) | BigDigdata90.txt |
June 1990
|
once
|
July 1990
|
RESEARCH LOCATION: Bisley Watersheds 1 and 2. The Bisley watersheds 1 and 2 are on the windward side of the mountains, have a mean annual precipitation of approximately 3500 mm, and occur in the subtropical forest life zone (Scatena, 1989).
INVESTIGATORS:
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS E-MAIL address
|
Whendee Silver |
OTHER RESEARCHERS E-MAIL address
| Fred Scatena | fns@sas.upenn.edu |
| Art Johnson | ahj@sas.upenn.edu |
|
Tom Siccama |
Thomas.Siccama@yale.edu |
CONTACT PERSONS E-MAIL address Phone Number (Include area code)
|
Whendee Silver |
(510) 643-3074 |
SOURCE OF FUNDING (SPONSOR): Mellon Foundation, NSF LTER, USDA Forest Service
DATA SET ABSTRACT:
(1) Exchangeable cation concentrations were measured using different soil extracting
procedures (fresh soil and air-dried and ground soil) to establish a range of
nutrient availability in the soil, and to determine the relationship between
different, but commonly used laboratory protocols.
(2) Soils extracted using fresh soils generally yielded significantly lower exchangeable Ca , Mg, and K concentrations than soils which were dried and ground prior to extraction. Soil nutrients generally decreased with depth in the soil.
(3) Several soil properties varied predictably across the landscape and could
be viewed in the context of a simple catena model. In the surface soils, exchangeable
base cation concentrations and pH decreased along a gradient from ridge tops
to riparian valleys, while soil organic matter, exchangeable Fe and acidity
increased along this gradient. On the ridges, N,P, and K were positively correlated
with soil organic matter; on slopes, N and P were positively correlated with
organic matter, and Ca, Kg, and pH were negatively correlated with exchangeable
Fe.
(4) Soil nutrient availability in the upper catena appears to be primarily controlled by biotic processes, particularly the accumulation of organic matter. Periodic flooding and impeded drainage in the lower catena resulted in a more heterogeneous environment. Drying and grinding the soil prior to extraction had a greater impact on exchangeable cations from the upper catena than in the valley positions, probably due to greater soil organic matter content. See Silver, W.L., F.N. Scatena, A.H. Johnson, T.G. Siccama, and M.J. Sanchez. 1994. Nutrient availability in a montane wet tropical forest in Puerto Rico: spatial patterns and methodological considerations. Plant and Soil 164:129-145.
DATA SET METHODS: In 1988, prior to sampling, the watersheds were surveyed and permanently marked with stakes on a 40 m grid. A description was made of each grid point including information about tree species composition, basal area, and classification of the topography as either ridge, side slope, valley, or riparian valley (Scatena, 1989; Scatena et al., 1993) - See LTERDBAS #31: 40 X 40 grid vegetation and site characteristics, Bisley at http://luq.lternet.edu/data/lterdb31/metadata/lterdb31.htm. In June 1988, forest floor and surface soils were sampled on Watersheds 1 and 2. Two 15 X 15 X 10 cm pits, one for chemistry and one for root and rock volume, were dug at each grid point, 1 m east and 1 m west of the stake. Pits were excavated by first securing a 15 X 15 cm template (insiude area) with long nails and removing all live vegetation. Forest floor material (composed of all recognizable dead plant material) was collected from within the sqaure and placed in a separate bag for processing. A 10 cm deep block of mineral soil was then carefully excavated and placed in a bag. Multiple soil samples from the 10-35 cm and 35-60 cm depths were collected from inside the excavated pit using a 2.5 cm diameter soil corer. At a few sites, it was not possible to collect samples from one or both of these lower horizons due to large rocks or roots.
To determine bul density of the 10-35 cm and 35-60 cm depths, eight large quantitative pits (50 X 50 cm) were located in four elevation bands along the ridge dividing the two watersheds. Forest floor was removed and soils were excavated by depth (0-10 cm, 10-35 cm, 35-60 cm) using a technique outlined in Hamburg (1984). Soil from each depth of the big pits was weighed in the field using a spring balance and subsampled for dry weight conversions (105° C).
Fresh samples were stored in air-tight bags at approximately 4° C for less than one week prior to extractions and pH determinations. A subsample from all chemistry pits and the two lower depths from the 'roots and rocks pit' was given to the International Institute of Tropical Forest (IITF) in Puerto Rico. (For Lab and Satatistical analyses methos see publication, Silver et al., 1994)
REFERENCES:
Hamburg, S. P. 1984. Effects of forest growth on soil nitrogenand organic matter pools following release from subsistence agriculture. Pages 145-148 in Forest Soils and Treatment Impacts Proceedings of the North American Forest Soils Conference. Knoxville.
Silver, W.L., F.N. Scatena, A.H. Johnson, T.G. Siccama, and M.J. Sanchez. 1994. Nutrient availability in a montane wet tropical forest in Puerto Rico: spatial patterns and methodological considerations. Plant and Soil 164:129-145.
Scatena, F.N. 1989. An introduction to the physiography and history of the Bisley Experimental Watersheds in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. General Technical Report SO-72. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, Louisiana.
CROSS-REFERENCES (other data sets related to this one):
SAMPLE LOCATION: Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies IITF, USDA Forest Service, Call Box 25000,, Rio Piedras, PR
STORAGE SITES (of data files): UC Berkeley
INVESTIGATOR'S ASSIGNED KEYWORDS: Nutrient cycling, nutrient availability, tropical forest ecology, plant/soil interactions
LEF LTER OFFICIAL KEYWORDS (See table): BISLEY WATERSHEDS: Q1, Q2, RIVER, BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, SOILS, HIGHER PLANTS, PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL
PUBLICATIONS:
Silver, W.L., F.N. Scatena, A.H. Johnson, T.G. Siccama, and M.J. Sanchez.
1994. Nutrient availability in a montane wet tropical forest in Puerto Rico:
spatial patterns and methodological considerations. Plant and Soil 164:129-145.
DISSEMINATION: UNRESTRICTED
REASONS TO RESTRICT DATA IN THIS DATA SET BEYOND ITS TWO YEAR POLICY PERIOD*:
*WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY LTER PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: N. BROKAW, A. LUGO
SITES DESCRIPTIONS: The study site is in the tabonuco (Dacryodes excelsa Vahl) forest zone of the Bisley Research Area
Geographical positional system (GPS) Coordinates for each location:
|
location |
latitude |
longitude |
| Bisley Watershed 1 | ||
| Bisley Watershed 2 |
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
X | Y |
TOPOGRAPHY
|
DEPTH
|
WD
|
Ca cml
|
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Grid number (X) | Grid number (Y) | topography | depth of soil | Wet/Dry Extractions | Calcium in cmol+ kg-1 |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
geographic X coordinates of plot center. Each grid point is a 10M diameter circle that was measured in 1988 prior to Hurricane Hugo (LTERDBAS #31) | geographic Y coordinate of plot center. Each grid
point is a 10M diameter circle that was measured in 1988 prior to Hurricane
Hugo (LTERDBAS
#31) |
topographic classification | Depth of extracted soil | Calcium concentration in cmol+ kg-1 determined on a DCP-Spectrumraspan V spectrophotometer from a KCl ground soils solutions. | |
|
UNIT |
N/A | N/A | N/A | cm | N/A | centimoles of charge per kilogram of dry soil (cmol+ kg-1) |
|
PRECISION |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ±.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
0,…,360 | 240,…,260 | R=Ridge S=Slope VU=Upland Valley VR=Riparian Valley |
1=0-10 cm 2=10-35 cm 3=35-60 cm |
1=wet extractions 2 = dry extractions |
|
|
DATA TYPE |
integer | integer | alphabetic |
integer
|
integer |
decimal
|
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
none | none | none |
none
|
999 |
VARIABLES CONTINUES:
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Mg cml | K cml | N % | P µg g-1 | SOM % | pH |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Magnesium in cmol+ kg-1 | Potassium in cmol+ kg-1 | Percent of Nitrogen | Extractable Phosphorus | Percent of Soil Organic Mater | pH |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Magnesium concentration in cmol+ kg-1 | Potassium concentration in cmol+ kg-1 | Percent of Nitrogen | Phosphorus concentration in µg g-1 | ||
|
UNIT |
centimoles of charge per kilogram of dry soil (cmol+ kg-1) | centimoles of charge per kilogram of dry soil (cmol+ kg-1) | percent | microgramsPerGram (ug /g) | percent | |
|
PRECISION |
±.01 | ±.01 | ±.01 | ±.1 | ±.01 | ±.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||||
|
DATA TYPE |
decimal | decimal | decimal | decimal | decimal | decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
999 | 999 | 999 | 999 | 999 | 999 |
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Al cml | Exacid | Ca kg ha-1 | Mg kg ha-1 | K kg ha-1 | N kg ha-1 |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Aluminium in cmol+ kg-1 | Exchangeable acidity | Kilograms of Calcium per hectare | Kilograms of Magnesium per hectare | Kilograms of Potassium per hectare | Kilograms of Nitrogen per hectare |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Aluminium concentration in cmol+ kg-1 | Exchangeable acidity | Kilograms of Calcium per hectare | Kilograms of Magnesium per hectare | Kilograms of Potassium per hectare | Kilograms of Nitrogen per hectare |
|
UNIT |
centimoles of charge per kilogram of dry soil (cmol+ kg-1) | centimoles of charge per kilogram of dry soil (cmol+ kg-1) | kilogramsPerHectare (Kg/ha) | kilogramsPerHectare (Kg/ha) | kilogramsPerHectare (Kg/ha) | kilogramsPerHectare (Kg/ha) |
|
PRECISION |
±.01 | ±.01 | ±.01 | ±.01 | ±.01 | ±.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||||||
|
DATA TYPE |
decimal | decimal | decimal | decimal | decimal | decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
999 | 999 | 999 | 999 | 999 |
VARIABLES CONTINUES:
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
1, 2
|
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
P kg ha-1 | Al kg ha-1 | Bulk Density |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Kilograms of Phosphorus per hectare | Kilograms of Aluminium per hectare | Bulk Density per grid point/depth/topography classification |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Kilograms of Phosphorus per hectare | Kilograms of Aluminium per hectare | Weight of soil contained within a given volume from soils excavated by depth after forest floor was removed using a technique outlined in Hamburg (1984) |
|
UNIT |
kilogramsPerHectare (Kg/ha) | kilogramsPerHectare (Kg/ha) | gramsPerCubicCentimeter (g/cm3) |
|
PRECISION |
±.01 | ±.01 | ±.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
|||
|
DATA TYPE |
decimal | decimal | decimal |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
999 | 999 | blank |
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS:
| Variable Name | Formula |
FOR DATA MANAGER USE ONLY
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: September 30, 2004
DATE OF LAST ENTRY: 1988
STAGE OF DATA SET MANAGEMENT (dates):
RECEIVED ENTERED: Aug 2000 Jan 2001
FILED ON-LINE Jan 2001
REVIEWED BY RESEARCHER
FILING MEDIA:
NAME OF DOCUMENTATION FILE: lterdb108.htm\
NAME OF ON - LINE CATALOG: LTERDBAS
RECORD #: 108
DOCUMENT TYPE: magnetic media
PRIORITY TO BE ENTERED: N/A
Rev. date of this form: 23 January 2001