LUQ LTER DATA SETS DOCUMENTATION FORM

ON-LINE VERSION

A DATA SET is a series of observations collected by the same methodology. Each data set should have documentation sufficient for someone unfamiliar with the research to replicate the study. Data sets may be broken into subsets (data files) that are discrete in space and time, in that order. The documentation for a data set should include all spatial and temporal subdivisions of the data.

(Data, Abstract, Methods, Variables)

NOTES:

PERSON(S) COMPLETING THIS FORM: E-MAIL ADDRESS:

Aaron Shiels

ashiels@hawaii.edu

DATA SET IDENTIFIER: Soil factors predict initial plant colonization on Puerto Rican landslides

PROJECT TITLE: Landslide Revegetation Project: Soil Factors predicting plant colonization

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landslide are among the most severe rainforest disturbances (Garwood et al. 1979, Hubbell & Foster 1986, Sousa 1984, Waide & Lugo 1992, Walker et al. in press), generating extreme abiotic spatial gradients (Fernández & Myster 1995) and exposing soil and parent material (Guariguata 1990). Landslides contain patches of vegetation surrounded by a matrix of soil or bare substrate (Dalling 1994, Myster & Fernández 1995). In addition, they often undergo recurrent localized disturbance either by resliding or by treefall at the edge of the landslide (Hartshorn 1980), thereby adding new plant preopagules, soil or organic material after the initial slippage. These landslide feature, coupled with interactions between patches of similar soil or vetetation (including seed dispersal, shading, litter deposition and vegetative reproduction), strongly suggets that landslide are a patch-dynamic system (Hupp 1983, Pickett & White 1985).

Soil Factors predicting initial plant colonization

A storm in 2003 caused 30 new landslides in the LEF that we used to examine prior hypotheses that slope stability and organically enriched soils are prerequisites for plant colonization.  We measured slope stability and litterfall 8-13 months following landslide formation.  At 13 months we also measured microtopography, soil characteristics (organic matter, particle size, total nitrogen, and water holding capacity), elevation, distance to forest edge, and canopy cover.  We used these measurements to predict the most important factors that contribute to initial plant colonization on landslides in the LEF.

LTER CORE AREAS: Annotate all that apply (See online list)

primary production
organic matter
inorganic nutrients

LEF LTER 1 RESEARCH TOPIC: (Annotate all that apply) (See online list)

Recovery-Gap Reveg
Disturbance
Recovery-SOM Form

We define a data file as a component of a data set. A data set can have only one data file or more. Basically, different data files have different data structures or format .
DATA SET FILES (SUBSETS):

Data File No.

Data File Identifier

On-Line Filename

Starting Date

Periodicity of sample

End Period

1

LCE LCE.txt April 2003 Variable before Dec 2003 and after May 2004; biweekly Dec 2003-May 2004 March 2006

RESEARCH LOCATION: Landslides in LEF off the Hwy 9966, Hwy 966 (El Portal to Bisley), and off the Hwy 191 (on north and south side of the El Yunque gate).

INVESTIGATORS:
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS E-MAIL ADDRESS:
Aaron Shiels ashiels@hawaii.edu
Lawrence R.Walker walker@unlv.nevada.edu

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS E-MAIL ADDRESS:
Paul Klawinski klawinskip@william.jewell.edu
Laura Weiss herbalmagik@yahoo.com
Christine West cwest30@hotmail.com

CONTACT PERSONS

Phone Number (Include area code)

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

Aaron Shiels (808) 956-3938 ashiels@hawaii.edu

SOURCE OF FUNDING (SPONSOR): U.S. National Science Foundation, University of Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Forest Service, supporting the Luquillo Experimental Forest Long-term Ecological Research Program (NSF grants: BSR-8811902, DEB-9411973, DEB-008538, DEB-0218039).

DATA SET ABSTRACT: Tropical storms are the principal cause of landslides in montane rainforests, such as the Luquillo Experimental Forest (LEF) of Puerto Rico .  A storm in 2003 caused 30 new landslides in the LEF that we used to examine prior hypotheses that slope stability and organically enriched soils are prerequisites for plant colonization.  We measured slope stability and litterfall in 1 m2 plots 8-13 months following landslide formation.  At 13 months we also measured microtopography, soil characteristics (organic matter, particle size, total nitrogen, and water holding capacity), elevation, distance to forest edge, and canopy cover, as well as plant aboveground biomass, plant cover, and root biomass

DATA SET METHODS: Of the 100+ landslides that occurred in the LEF as a result of the April 17-19, 2003 storm event, approximately 69 were road-related (within 200 m of a road; Larsen 1995), and were ≥12 m2 in area and <55o slope (A. Shiels, unpublished data). We randomly chose 30 of those 69 landslides for our study. The landslides ranged in elevation from 152 m to 825 m a.s.l. (see Appendix 1 in Shiels et al. 2008), spanned tabonuco, palo colorado, palm, and cloud forest types, and were found on areas underlain by both volcaniclastic (n = 8) and diorite (n = 22) soil types. In October 2003, we randomly located a 1 x 1m plots within the landslide chute (the central area of highest erosion within a landslide; Guariguata 1990) of each of the 30 landslides. The chute portion of the landslide was selected because it was present on all chosen landslides (often road-related landslides have the lower deposition zone removed in order to clear the roadways), and was not too steep to access (the upper, slip-face zones often have near-vertical slopes). The plots were at least 1 m (mean ± SE = 2.54 ± 0.21 m) from any forest-landslide edge. Within each plot on each of the 30 landslides, we measured all of the parameters for this study, which included: slope stability and litterfall from December 2003 to May 2004 (8-13 months following landslide formation); and in May 2004, we measured microtopography, soil characteristics (organic matter, particle size, nitrogen, and water holding capacity), elevation, distance to forest edge, canopy cover (measured with a densiometer), and vegetation colonization.

Sediment Runoff
Sediment runoff was measured at the base of each plot using a 100 cm x 8 cm x 7 cm deep, open-top plastic rain gutter placed perpendicular to the slope and tilted to allow flow into a plastic collection bucket. We removed and obtained wet mass of all sediment from the gutters and buckets every two weeks from December 2003 to May 2004 (24 weeks), then determined total sediment dry mass by taking subsamples of the sediment wet mass and calculating wet/dry mass ratios. 

Microtopography
Because microtopography of the soil surface can affect plant colonization, we calculated a roughness index (Saleh 1993) of each litter removal plot during May 2004. We measured the depth to the soil surface from an imaginary horizontal plane placed on the highest emergent point from the plot surface and parallel to the plot slope. Measurements were made every 10 cm along three horizontal transects across each plot (25, 50 and 75 cm from the bottom edge; total = 33 measurements per plot). 

Organic matter
Organic matter measurements included litterfall (litter removal plots only) and SOM (both control and litter removal plots). Litterfall was collected from each plot, rinsed to remove sediment and dried at 45o C before weighing. This process was repeated every two weeks from October 2003 to May 2004. Soil organic matter (SOM; % loss on ignition), was determined from three soil cores (1.9 cm diameter and 10 cm deep) taken in May 2004 from random locations within each plot. Soils from these cores were also analyzed for particle size (% sand and clay; Sheldrick and Wang 1993) and total nitrogen (Kjeldahl digestion followed by colorimetric analysis; Alpkem 1992). An additional soil core (7 cm diameter to 10 cm depth) was taken from each plot in May 2004 in order to determine the water-holding capacity of the soil by saturating each soil sample, allowing it to drain for 10 min before weighing, and finally drying (to a constant mass at 105o C) before reweighing each sample. 

Plant colonization and early successional development on the 30 landslides were evaluated by measuring vegetation cover and biomass from each plot in May 2004. Because cover estimates are vertical projections onto the ground surface, values can exceed 100%. All aboveground plant biomass (live or standing dead) was removed from each plot (litter removal and control) and dry mass was determined for the same six plant categories used for vegetation cover. Only plants rooted in the plot were harvested. Belowground biomass (coarse roots only) was also estimated in May 2004 by sampling then pooling two cores in each plot (7 cm diameter, 16 cm depth, 616 cm3) and manually separating all roots and fern rhizomes (live or dead) >1 mm diameter before drying them to a constant mass. 

REFERENCES:

Alpkem Corporation (1992) The Flow Solution Operation Manual. Alpkem Corporation, Wilsonville, Oregon.

Guariguata MR (1990) Landslide disturbance and forest regeneration in the upper Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. Journal of Ecology 78: 814-832.

Larsen M (1995) How wide is a road? Synergistic anthropogenic and mass-wasting disturbance in a forested montane environment, Puerto Rico. American Geophysical Union Transactions 76 (17): S309.

Saleh A (1993) Soil roughness measurement: Chain method. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48: 527-529.

Sheldrick BH, Wang C (1993) Particle size distribution. In Carter M.R. (Ed.). Soil Sampling Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 507-509.

Shiels, A.B., C.A. West, L. Weiss, P.D. Klawinski, and L.R. Walker. 2008. Soil factors predict initial plant colonization on Puerto Rican landslides. Plant Ecology 195: 165-178.

CROSS-REFERENCES (other data sets related to this one):

LTERDBAS#7: Soil Characteristics of Landslide; LTERDBAS#15: Revegetation of landslides, vegetation 0.1m (Small landslide plots at the Luquillo Experimental Forest); LTERDBAS#18: Revegetation of landslides, vegetation > 1.0m (Large landslide plots at the Luquillo Experimental Forest); LTERDBAS#36: Landslide Revegetation Canopy Measurements & Cover Estimates; LTERDBAS#52: Above ground biomass in landslides; LTERDBAS#154: Soil factors predict initial plant colonization on Puerto Rican landslides

SAMPLE LOCATION:

Soils are in Dr. Walker’s lab, University of Nevada , Las Vegas

STORAGE SITES(of data files):

INVESTIGATOR'S ASSIGNED KEYWORDS: colonization, disturbance, landslide, plants, succession

LEF LTER OFFICIAL KEYWORDS (See table):

PUBLICATIONS:
Shiels, A. B., C.A. West, L. Weiss, P.D. Klawinski, and L.R. Walker. 2008. Soil factors predict initial plant colonization on Puerto Rican landslides. Plant Ecology 195:165-178. (Abstract)

Walker, L.R., and A.B. Shiels.  2008.  Post-disturbance erosion impacts carbon fluxes and plant succession on recent tropical landslides.  Plant and Soil 313:  205-216. (Abstract)

DISSEMINATION:

RESTRICTED ___ UNRESTRICTED _X_

REASONS TO RESTRICT DATA IN THIS DATA SET BEYOND ITS TWO YEAR POLICY PERIOD*:

*WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY AT LEAST ONE LUQ LTER PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: N. Brokaw, A. LUGO

FILING

_X__ "File" copy only:Data Management will only file an electronic copy of the data file and its documentation 
___ " Enter" data on-line:Data Management will be in charge of entering the data on computer files (Contact Eda C. Meléndez)

SITES DESCRIPTIONS:

Geographical positional system (GPS) Coordinates for each location:

location

latitude

longitude

     

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)        
NAME OF VARIABLE plot soil type Plot slope _degrees elevation _m
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE Name of research area where all the observations and measurements took place (i.e., the landslide name). No data is missing. One of the following soil types of the landslides; Volcaniclastic or Diorite. No data is missing. The slope (measured in degrees) of the plot. No data is missing. The elevation above sea level. No data is missing.
UNIT     degree meter
PRECISION        
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES   VC = Volcaniclastic; D = Diorite    
DATA TYPE alphanumeric alphabetic numeric numeric
MISSINGDATA CODES        

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)          
NAME OF VARIABLE Canopy cover litterfall_g-m2-day Microtopo index Sediment pH
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE Canopy percent cover measured at 1 meter above the group directly over the plot. No data is missing. The average bi-weeklylitterfallover the 6 month period (Dec 2003 to May 2004). No data is missing. The microtopography index for each plot. No data is missing. The average bi-weekly sediment running off the 1 m plots over the 6 month period (Dec 2003 to May 2004). No data is missing. The soil pH measured in May 2004. No data is missing.
UNIT   gramsPerSquareMeter per day   gramsPerSquareMeter per day  
PRECISION          
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES          
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES          

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)          
NAME OF VARIABLE Soil H20 holding cap SOM Sand Clay Distance to closest edge_m
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE Soil water percent holding capacity. No data is missing. Soil organic matter percent measured 0-10 cm in May 2004. No data is missing. Soil sand percent measured 0-10 cm in May 2004. No data is missing. Soil clay percent measured 0-10 cm in May 2004. No data is missing. The distance from the edge of the landslide to the closest edge of the plot within the landslide. No data is missing.
UNIT         meter
PRECISION          
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES          
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES          

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)        
NAME OF VARIABLE TKN _mg-g veg cover total AGB _g-m2 Roots _g-m2
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE Total soil nitrogen in Mg/g of soil at 0-10cm soil depth, measured in May 2004. No data is missing. Total vegetation cover (%) for each 1 x 1 m plot. No data is missing. Total above-ground vegetation biomass for each plot. No data is missing. Total coarse roots at 0-10 cm soil depth for each plot. No data is missing.
UNIT milligram per gram   gramsPerSquareMeter gramsPerSquareMeter
PRECISION        
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES        
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES        

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)            
NAME OF VARIABLE Total Biomass _g-m2 Sed D Sed Dd Sed J Sed Jj Sed F
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE Total above-ground and coarse root biomass for each plot. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during early Dec 2003. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during late Dec 2003. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during early Jan 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during late Jan 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during early Feb 2004. No data is missing.
UNIT gramsPerSquareMeter gramsPerSquareMeter per day grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day
PRECISION            
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES            
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES            

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)          
NAME OF VARIABLE Sed Ff Sed M Sed Mm Sed A Sed Aa
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE The total sediment running off the plots during late Feb 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during early March 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during late March 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during early April 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during late April 2004. No data is missing.
UNIT grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day
PRECISION          
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES          
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES          

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)          
NAME OF VARIABLE Sed My Sed Mym Ltr D Ltr Dd Ltr J
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE The total sediment running off the plots during early May 2004. No data is missing. The total sediment running off the plots during late May 2004. No data is missing. The daily totallitterfall collected off the plots during early December 2003. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during late December 2003. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during early January 2004. No data is missing.
UNIT grams Per meters per day grams Per meters per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day
PRECISION          
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES          
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES          

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)          
NAME OF VARIABLE Ltr Jj Ltr F Ltr Ff Ltr M Ltr Mm
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during late January 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during early February 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during late February 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during early March 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during late March 2004. No data is missing.
UNIT gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day
PRECISION          
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES          
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES          

VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):

File Name or # above(all in which the variable appears) 1 1 1 1
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file)        
NAME OF VARIABLE Ltr A Ltr Aa Ltr Mya Ltr Myaa
DEFINITION OFVARIABLE The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during early April 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during late April 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during early May 2004. No data is missing. The totallitterfallcollected off the plots during late May 2004. No data is missing.
UNIT gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day gramsPerSquareMeter per day
PRECISION        
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES        
DATA TYPE numeric numeric numeric numeric
MISSING DATA CODES        

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS:

Variable Name

Formula

   


FOR DATA MANAGER USE ONLY

DATE OF LAST REVIEW: March 7, 2009

DATE OF LAST ENTRY :

STAGE OF DATA SET MANAGEMENT (dates) :

RECEIVED: Aug 17, 2008
ENTERED:  Aug 17, 2008
FILED ON-LINE: March 7, 2009
REVIEWED BY RESEARCHER: March 3, 2009

 

FILING MEDIA :

NAME OF DOCUMENTATION FILE : dsetallfrm_Shiels.doc, lterdb154.htm
NAME OF ON - LINE CATALOG : LTERDBAS
RECORD # :   154
DOCUMENT TYPE :  digital only
PRIORITY TO BE ENTERED :  N/A

 

Rev. date of this form: 28 July 200/ 15 July  2001/June 9, 2003/March 16, 2004/12 April 2005/ 8 November 2005/ 16 January 2006