LUQ LTER DATA SETS DOCUMENTATION FORM
ON-LINE VERSION
A DATA SET is a series of observations collected by the same methodology. Each data set should have documentation sufficient for someone unfamiliar with the research to replicate the study. Data sets may be broken into subsets (data files) that are discrete in space and time, in that order. The documentation for a data set should include all spatial and temporal subdivisions of the data.
(Data, Abstract, Methods, Variables)
NOTES:
PERSON(S) COMPLETING THIS FORM: E-MAIL ADDRESS:
|
Eda C. Melendez-Colom |
DATA SET IDENTIFIER: Tree damage by Hurricane Hugo on the Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto Rico
PROJECT TITLE: Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot - Community Structure and Disturbance in a Tropical Forest.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The processes that determine the plant species diversity and structure of tropical forest are still uncertain despite many years of investigation. A tropical forest characteristically has few common species and many rare species, with conspecifics often widely distributed throughout the forest. The potential for inter and intra-specific interactions are numerous, and it is difficult to determine which factors maintain species diversity or how rare species survive in the population. Factors that we believe contribute to tropical forest structure and composition include the physical environment and past history of the forest, species-specific physiological requirements for light, nutrients and water necessary for growth, survival and reproduction, and pathogens and herbivores. Despite the substantial amount of information available about these factors, we are still unable to accurately model the current composition of tropical forest or to predict its future response to human and natural disturbances.
The Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), previously known as the Hurricane Recovery Plot (Zimmerman et. al. 1994) and the Luquillo long-term ecological research grid (Soil Survey 1995), is a 16-ha forest plot (SW corner 18° 20’ N, 65° 49’ W) located near El Verde Field Station. The plot is 500 m N-S and 320 m E-W and is divided into 400 20 x 20 m quadrats, with each quadrat sub divided into 16 5 x 5 m sub-quadrats. The field station and LFDP are in the Luquillo Mountains of northeastern Puerto Rico, approximately 35 km southeast of San Juan. Information from the LFDP contributes to the efforts of the Center for Tropical Forest Science (CTFS, Smithsonian) network of large tropical forest plots in order to improve our understanding of tropical forest and to predict its future. Large plots (typically 50 ha) are required to cover local environmental variation, include sufficient numbers of individuals of both the common and rare species, and to determine plant spatial relationships. Population monitoring is required over many years to elucidate tree life histories, species interactions and population changes in order to determine the forest response to environmental changes and disturbance.
The LFDP is unique among the CTFS sites as it has a history of land use disturbance and also hurricane damage. These two disturbance types interact and influence the community dynamics and species composition in the LFDP. The Northern area (approximately two thirds of the plot) was disturbed by tree felling and farming until 1934 when the land was purchased by United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. The Southern third was not farmed and only suffered relatively light disturbance from selective logging. Aerial photographs taken in 1936 show differences in canopy cover caused by the patterns of land use history. Clear patterns in the distribution of some species reflect this land use history (Thompson et. al. in press). The distribution of species as a result of the land use history interacts with hurricane disturbance, as those species colonizing the northern part of the LFDP are more susceptible to hurricane damage (Zimmerman et. al. 1994). Major hurricanes struck the forest area of the LFDP in 1928 and 1932 and after a 66 year period with relatively little hurricane damage, the forest was struck by Hurricane Hugo in 1989 and Hurricane Georges in 1998, both hurricanes causing significant damage.
LFDP CENSUS HISTORY.
The LFDP was established in 1990 and the censuses are carried out in accordance with CTFS protocol (Condit 1998) with only minor variations. The first assessment of stems >= 10 cm D130 (diameter at breast height [DBH] of 130 cm from the ground) consisting of stems damaged by Hurricane Hugo (September 1989) was carried out from August 1990 to September 1991 (Everham 1996). The first complete census of all stems >=1 cm D130 lasted from August 1990 to September 1993. This first census was divided into three surveys with the first survey (August 1990 to February 1992) comprising all free standing (excluding lianas) woody stems >= 10 cm D130. The second survey (overlapping the third survey) consisted of checks on a small number of quadrats in which a few large stems >= 10 cm D130 were found that had been "missed" during the first survey. The third survey of woody stems >= 1 cm <10 cm D130 was carried out between April 1992 and September 1993. During Census 1 surveys 2 and 3 stems were found that were >=10 cm D130 and, therefore, were most likely to have been present in the forest at the time of Census 1 survey 1. In addition in Census 2 (November 1994 to October 1996), stems were found >=3 cm D130 (>=5 cm D130 for Cecropia schreberiana and Schefflera morototoni) which may have been missed in Census 1. In order to include these "missed" stems in the appropriate census and survey we calculated what diameter the stem would have been at the time the quadrat in which it was located was initially assessed. These "missed" stems were allocated to earlier censuses and census surveys based either upon the actual growth rate of that stem, if more than one measurement was available, or the median growthrate for that species. The median growthrate was calculated for two size classes of stems >=1, <10 cm, or >=10 to 30 cm D130. Using the most appropriate growthrate the diameter of the "missed" stem was extrapolated back in time to estimate the stem diameter at the correct survey time in Census 1. If the calculated diameter matched the size class for an earlier survey the stem was allocated to it with its estimated diameter. Information for stems >=10 cm D130 damaged during Hurricane Hugo was combined with data for stems >=10 cm D130, in census 1 survey 1 together with "missed" stems recorded in later surveys to reconstruct the forest as it was at the time of Hurricane Hugo. The reconstruction to represent the forest at the time of Hurricane Hugo did not include diameter extrapolations back to September 1989, but to the time at which the appropriate size class of stems were measured between August 1990 and September 1993. The palm Prestoea acuminata was allocated to earlier census surveys based upon the height of the point of measurement and additional observations. Further details on the procedures for allocating these "missed" stems to the appropriate census surveys can be found in the descriptions in the relevant data files. The last corrections to the Census 1 this data were made in May 2001.
In all censuses individual stems of the specified size were tagged, identified and measured for D130. On multiple stemmed plants, all stems were individually tagged and the group of stems representing an individual plant was recorded. In the first and second census stems >=10 cm D130 were mapped. Following CTFS protocol we are conducting the censuses at 5 year intervals. The second census (November 1994 to October 1996) consisted of only one survey with all stems >=1 cm D130 censused at the same time, although only stems >=10 cm D130 were mapped. The third census (funded by the Andrew Mellon Foundation) started in July 2000 and is expected to finish in April 2002. In this third census, in addition to mapping stems >=10 cm D130, we are also mapping the location of stems >=1 cm D130.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
We are grateful for the work of many people who helped inventory the LFDP. In particular, technicians: R. DeLeon, J. Bithorn, M. Aponte, A.-L. Méndez, M. Estades, A. Estrada, S. Matta, plant taxonomist B. Boom, and data manager Eda Melendez. Many volunteers, too numerous to mention, were also a tremendous help with the census. We thank the United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA for the soil survey. The International Institute of Tropical Forestry (IITF) gave us access to their historical records and timber cruise surveys, and we thank Dr. Frank Wadsworth and Octavio Jodan who helped interpret them. John Thomlinson helped prepare the digital maps of stem locations and the soil map. The aerial photographs were analyzed at The Harvard Forest, Harvard University.
LTER CORE AREAS: (Annotate
all that apply)
|
Population Dynamics |
|
Disturbance Patterns |
|
Primary Productivity |
LEF
LTER 1 RESEARCH TOPIC: (Annotate all that apply)
|
Recovery After Disturbance |
|
Disturbance
Regime |
We define a data file as a component of a data set. A data set can have
only one data file or more. Basically, different data files have different data
structures or format.
DATA SET FILES (SUBSETS):
|
Data File No. |
Data File Identifier |
On-Line Filename |
Starting Date |
Periodicity of sample |
End Period |
|
1 |
LFDP Tree damage by Hurricane Hugo |
August 1990 |
Once after Hurricane Hugo |
September 1993 |
|
|
2
|
LFDP Tree damage by Hurricane Hugo (with calculated diameter) |
August 1990 |
Once after Hurricane Hugo |
September 1993 |
Note: If for some reason you have problems accessing and downloading the data through the forms, send us a message to emelendez@lternet.edu in which you give us a brief statement of the purpose to use the data.
RESEARCH LOCATION:Luquillo
Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP, southwest plot corner 18°
20’ N, 65° 49’ W), El Verde Research Area, Luquillo Experimental Forest,
Caribbean National Forest, Puerto Rico.
INVESTIGATORS:
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS E-MAIL address
|
Jill
Thompson |
|
|
Jess
Zimmerman |
|
|
Nicholas
Brokaw |
OTHER
RESEARCHERS E-MAIL address
|
Robert
B. Waide |
|
|
Wyn
M. Everham III |
|
|
D.
Jean Lodge |
|
|
Charlotte
M. Taylor |
|
|
Diana
Garcia-Monteil |
|
|
Marcheterre
Fluet |
|
CONTACT PERSONS E-MAIL address Phone Number
(Include area code)
|
Jill Thompson |
787-380-3220 |
|
|
Nicholas
Brokaw |
1-787-764-0000
x 4940 |
DATA SET ABSTRACT: Hurricane Hugo struck the Caribbean national forest in September 1989. Files LFDP_HURRDAM.TXT and LFDP_HURRDAMa.TXT contain data on the damage to trees caused by the hurricane collected by Mr. R. DeLeon between August 1990 and September 1991. Mr. DeLeon walked throughout the plot to find stems >= 10 cm diameter that had apparently been damaged or killed by the hurricane in an effort to collect information before the damaged stems rotted. The information on these stems was later combined with the results of the first census to reconstruct the forest, as it would have appeared, at the time of Hurricane Hugo. This file contains the hurricane damage data collected for stems damaged by Hurricane Hugo combined with data for the stems recorded subsequently in the first complete LFDP census starting in 1990. Some stems that were measured in Census 1 survey 2 and survey 3 or Census 2 that were believed to have been missed in Census 1 survey 1, are also included (see census history above) and are assumed to have been undamaged by Hurricane Hugo. The structure of the data files is the same for both files LFDP_HURRDAM.TXT and LFDP_HURRDAMa.TXT but the diameter of the trees in LFDP_HURRDAMa.TXT have been calculated by extrapolating diameters backwards from subsequent measurements to the time of the Census 1 survey 1. Diameters in file LFDP_HURRDAMa.TXT can not be used for growth measurements. For our publications we treat files LFDP_HURRDAM.TXT and LFDP_HURRDAMa.TXT as one data set.
The National Science Foundation
requires that data from projects it funds are posted on the web two years after
any data set has been organized and "cleaned". The data from each
census of the LFDP will be updated at intervals as each survey of the LFDP shows
errors in the previous data collection. After posting on the web, researchers
who are not part of the project are then welcome to use the data. Given the
enormous amount of time, effort and resources required to manage the LFDP, obtain
these data, and ensure data accuracy, LFDP Principal Investigators request that
researchers intending to use this data comply with the requests below. Through
complying with these requests we can ensure that the data are interpreted correctly,
analyses are not repeated unnecessarily, beneficial collaboration between users
is promoted and the Principle Investigators investment in this project is protected.
Please comply with the following requests:
DATA SET METHODS: Mr. R. DeLeon walked throughout the LFDP, and in each 20 m x 20 m quadrat flagged and gave temporary numbers to all stems of woody plants >= 10 cm D130 , that were assessed as having been killed or damaged by Hurricane Hugo. The species were identified, a diameter measured, and information such as the type of damage, cause of death, substrate on which the stem was standing, and direction the stem was thrown by the wins was recorded. Although many stems were damaged and sometimes dead when assessed, Mr. DeLeon was able to identify many of them from form and bark characteristics. The data for diameter is that recorded in Census 1 survey 1 (even if the stem was dead by this time). Tip directions in this file are also those recorded during Census 1 survey 1 and not those recorded by Mr. DeLeon. In addition, the substrate data and some additional comments as to what might have caused the stem damage are not present in this data file.
The temporary numbers given my Mr.
DeLeon were changed to permanent numbers when the subsequent full Census 1 survey
1 recording of stems >=10 cm D130 was carried out.
REFERENCES:
Brown, S., A. E. Lugo, S. Silander, and L. Liegel. 1983. Research history and
opportunities in the Luquillo Experimental Forest. USDA Forest Service General
Technical Report SO-44, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, Louisiana,
USA.
Condit, R. 1998. Tropical Forest census Plots. Springer, Berlin
Everham, E. M. III 1996. Hurricane disturbance and recovery: An empirical and simulation study of vegetation dynamics in the Luquillo Experimental Forest. PhD. State University of New York.
Soil Survey Staff. 1995. Order 1 Soil Survey of the Luquillo Long-Term Ecological Research Grid, Puerto Rico. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Zimmerman, J. K., E. M. Everham, III, R. B. Waide, D. J. Lodge, C. M. Taylor, and N. V. L. Brokaw. 1994. Responses of tree species to hurricane winds in subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico: implications for tropical tree life histories. Journal of Ecology 82:911-922.
Zimmerman, J. K., E. M. Everham,
III, R. B. Waide, D. J. Lodge, C. M. Taylor, and N. V. L. Brokaw. 1994. Responses
of tree species to hurricane winds in subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico:
implications for tropical tree life histories. Journal of Ecology 82:911-922.
CROSS-REFERENCES
(other data sets related to this one): LTERDBAS46:
Elevation at grid points on the Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto
Rico; LTERDB47: Physical
environment of the Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto Rico, LTERDB57:
Tree damage by Hurricane Hugo at the Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto
Rico, LTERDB60:
Tree Map for Census at the Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto
Rico; LTERDB62: Canopy height profile starting 1992, 1994 and
1996 of the Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto Rico; LTERDB118: Species
names and codes of the Luquillo Forest
Dynamics Plot (LFDP), Puerto Rico; LTERDB119:
Census of species, diameter and location at the Luquillo Forest Dynamics
Plot (LFDP), Puerto Rico;
STORAGE SITES (of data files): Paper and
computer files at ITES; Computer files at El Verde Field Station
INVESTIGATOR'S ASSIGNED KEYWORDS: Luquillo Forest Dynamics Plot, LFDP,
Hurricane Recovery Plot, plant community composition, plant diversity, Luquillo
Experimental Forest, El Verde Field Station, Puerto Rico.
LEF LTER OFFICIAL KEYWORDS (See table):
EL VERDE, LFDP (EV Big Grid), MOIST, TABONUCO,
COMMUNITY COMPOSITION, DISTURBANCE, HUMAN, HURRICANE, ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES,
POPULATION DYNAMICS , PRIMARY PRODUCTION, TREE GROWTH, HIGHER PLANTS, FERNS,
HERBS, PALMS, SHRUBS, TREES , PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL
PUBLICATIONS:
Brokaw, N., Fraver, S., Rear, J.S., Thompson, J., Zimmerman, J.K., Waide, R.
B., Everham, E.M., Hubbell, S.P., Condit, R. and Foster, R.B. In press.
Disturbance and Canopy structure in two tropical forests. In R. Condit, and
J. Lafrakie (eds) Tropical forest diversity and dynamism: results
from a network of large plots. Smithsonian Institution.
Brokaw, N. and Thompson. J. 2000. The H for DBH. Forest Ecology and Management 129:89-91.
García-Montiel, D. C. In press. La presencia humana en los bosques neotropicales húmedos. In M. Guariguata and G. Kattan, editors. Ecología de Bosque Lluvioso Neotropical. Editorial Agroamérica, San José, Costa Rica.
Thompson, J., N. Brokaw, J. K. Zimmerman, R. B. Waide, E. M. Everham, III, D. J. Lodge, C. M. Taylor, D. Garc&icute;a-Montiel, and M. Fluet. In press. Land use history, environment, and tree composition in a tropical forest. Ecological Applications.
Thompson, J., Brokaw, N., Zimmerman, J.K., Waide, R.B., Everham, E.M.. and Schaefer, D.A. In press. The Luquillo forest dynamics plot. In R. Condit, and J. Lafrakie (eds) Tropical forest diversity and dynamism: results from a network of large plots. Smithsonian Institution.
Zimmerman, J. K., E. M. Everham, III, R. B. Waide, D. J. Lodge, C. M. Taylor, and N. V. L. Brokaw. 1994. Responses of tree species to hurricane winds in subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico: implications for tropical tree life histories. Journal of Ecology 82:911-922.
DISSEMINATION: UNRESTRICTED
REASONS TO RESTRICT DATA IN THIS DATA SET BEYOND ITS TWO YEAR POLICY PERIOD*:
*WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY LTER PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: J. ZIMMERMAN, A. LUGO , D.J. LODGE
FILING
_X_ "File" copy only :
Data Management will only file an electronic copy of the data file and its documentation
___ "Enter" data on-line : Data Management will be in charge of entering
the data on computer files (Contact Eda C. Meléndez)
SITES
DESCRIPTION: The LFDP is within the Luquillo Experimental Forest
(LEF, established in 1956) which is coterminous with the Caribbean National
Forest and covers 11,330-ha of the Luquillo mountains (Brown et
al. 1983). There are four different forest types within the LEF including
tabonuco, colorado, palm-brake, and dwarf forest. These forest types are associated
with different soil types and are roughly stratified by elevation (Brown et
al. 1983). The LFDP lies within the tabonuco
forest that is named after a dominant tree, Dacryodes
excelsa Vahl (Burseraceae). Tabonuco forest develops best on low, protected,
well-drained ridges below 600 m a.s.l. Mean canopy height in tabonuco forest
is about 20 m, with tallest trees to c. 35m. Few trees in the LFDP exceed 1
m DBH. The forest in Puerto Rico is subject to hurricane damage and canopy
height is lower, and canopy structure is broken, in the years after hurricanes.
CLIMATE
The climate is classified
as tropical montane in Walsh’s (1996) tropical climate system, and as
subtropical wet in the Holdridge life zone
system (Ewel and Whitmore 1973). Annual rainfall at El Verde averages just
over 3500 mm yr-1 (1975-1999). On average there is no month with
<200 mm of rain, although a drier season occurs from January through April.
The highest rainfall recorded at El Verde between 1975 and 2001 (370 mm in less
than 12 hours) fell on 17 April 1997. There are also severe droughts, such
as in 1994, when less than 70% of the average annual rain fell, and many small
streams in the forest stopped flowing entirely for two months. Daily average
maximum air temperature is 25.2 °C, minimum is 20.5 °C,
and average is 22.8 °C (Brown et al. 1983, and also see weather data
on this web site). Severe hurricanes struck the LFDP forest area in 1928, 1932,
1989 and 1998.
LFDP TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL.
Topography on the
LFDP has northwest-running drainages producing steep northeast and southwest-facing
slopes, with an elevation across the plot which ranges from 333 to 428 m asl.
The mean slope of the plot is 17% but ranges from 3 to 60%. Soils were formed
in residual volcanic ash that fell in the ocean to form volcaniclastic sandstones
and siltstones, which were subsequently uplifted (F. Scatena pers. comm.).
Soils are dominated by old, deeply weathered kaolinitic Oxisols (Zarzal) and
Ultisols (Cristal), and young, less-developed Entisols (Coloso and Fluvaquents)
and Inceptisols (Preito) in stream channels. Zarzal, Cristal and Prieto are
deep clay soils, while Coloso and Fluvequents are formed from alluvium in the
stream channels (Soil Survey Staff 1995).
|
location |
latitude |
longitude |
|
South West Corner of plot |
18°
19" 26' North |
65°
49" 3' West |
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Tag | Quad | Subquad |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Tag |
Quadrat code number |
Subquadrat number |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Unique number for each stem. | Code represents the 20 x 20 m quadrat based upon its position in the rows and columns of the 16 ha grid. The first 2 digits form the column number counting quadrats from West to East and the second two digits form the row number counting quadrats South to North. Leading zeros are not displayed so quadrats in columns 1-9 have only 3 digits |
Code representing the position each of the 16 5m by 5 m subquadrat within each 20 m x 20 m quadrat. The code consists of 2 numbers. The first is the number of the plot counting from the southwest corner of the quadrat to the east. The second is the number of the subquadrat counting from the southwest corner to the north. See arrangement below |
|
UNIT |
None | None | None |
|
PRECISION |
N/A | N/A | N/A |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
From -127736 to 139316 with many numbers not used | 0101 first quadrat in southwest corner to 2525 last quadrat in North East corner |
NW 14 24 34 44 NE 13 23 33 34 12 22 32 42 SW 11 21 31 41 SE |
|
DATA TYPE |
Integer | Alphanumeric | Alphanumeric |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
None | None | None |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Main stem | NEWSPP | Palm ht |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Main stem | New species name | Palm Height |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
The main stem tag number is the number for an individual plant. Numbers in this field show that the stem with a tag number, in the same row of data is attached to the stem with this main stem number. | A 6 letter code for the species name for this individual. First three letters are the first three letter of the genus and the second three letters the first three letters of the species name. Variations to this rule are possible. See species list file LFDP_species. The species identifications include corrections made after census 2. | The height above the ground at which the palm diameter was measured. |
|
UNIT |
None | None | Centimeters |
|
PRECISION |
N/A | N/A | +/- 1 cm |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
Potentially between -127736 to 139316 with many numbers not used | See file LFDP_spp | -130, 130 |
|
DATA TYPE |
Integer | Alphanumeric | Integer |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
A blank means that either the stem in this row of data is either a main stem itself so it does not have a main stem number in this field. Or alternatively that this stem represents an individual plant that does not have multiple stems. |
Blank means no species identification was possible. Dead means tree was dead and no species identification was possible. ING? Means Inga species not determined. |
-130 means we believed palm height was 130 cm from the ground but this was not recorded in the field data. Only used when species is Prestoea acuminata. |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Fdiam | Degrees | 1st Measure |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
"Fixed" diameter of stems measured in Census 1 (survey 1, 2 and 3) | Direction of lean or tip up in degrees from North | 1st Measure |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
In file LFDP_HURRDAM.txt these are actual diameter measurements on the indicated date. LFDP_HURRDAMa.txt these diameters were calculated to give the diameter that the stem would have had, if it had not been "missed" and had been measured in the correct survey for it's size class. Date for each stem in LFDP_HURRDAMa.txt means the actual date a diameter was recorded although the diameter was calculated for an earlier time. |
The direction the main stem is leaning or broken off, as a result of being tipped up, snapped off, broken at the root or bent (Values not adjusted for magnetic declination of 7.5 degrees) |
This variable has two meanings depending upon the type of damage the tree received. If the tree was snapped off it means the height at which it was broken. If the tree was tipped up it means the width of the exposed root ball. |
|
UNIT |
Centimeters | Degrees | Meters |
|
PRECISION |
0.1 cm. Calculated diameters for stems D 10 cm may be given to 0.01 cm. | Unknown - compass reading | Estimated + or - 10% |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
10.00 cm to 150.78 cm | 0-360 | 0.5 - 24 |
|
DATA TYPE |
Numeric | Integer | Numeric |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
Blank means no data recorded. | Only recorded when the tree received major trunk damage. A blank means tree was tipped up or bent etc. or the measurement was not taken |
Only used when tree received major stem damage or tip-up. Blank means tree was undamaged, it was broken at the roots or bent. A zero is used to indicate a secondary stem in a tip-up to prevent double counting in calculations of the total disturbed area. |
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
2st Measure | Br | Number |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
2st Measure | Branches | Number of branches |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
This variable has two meanings depending upon the type of damage the tree received. If the tree was snapped off it means an estimate of the tree height before it was broken. If the tree was tipped up it means the height of the exposed root ball. |
Branches >10 cm diameter broken from the tree | Number of branches > 10 cm diameter that were broken off. |
|
UNIT |
meters | N/A | N/A |
|
PRECISION |
Estimated + or - 10% | Unknown, based upon an assessment from the ground. | Unknown, based upon an assessment from the ground. |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
0.4 - 29.5 | Br or blank | 1 - 12 |
|
DATA TYPE |
Numeric | Alphanumeric | Numeric |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
Only used when tree received major stem damage or tip-up. Blank means tree was undamaged, it was broken at the roots or bent. A zero is used to indicate a secondary stem in a tip-up to prevent double counting in calculations of the total disturbed area. |
Blank means this condition does not apply or the assessment was not made. | Only used when variable "Br" recorded. Blank means this condition does not apply or the number of branches could not be determined. |
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
S/L/P | HURRDAM | Dead |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Standing, Leaning or Prone | Hurricane damage | Dead |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Tree was either standing, leaning at more than 45 degrees from the vertical or prone and lying on the ground | The degree of damage sustained during Hurricane Hugo. Only the major category of damage is included. | Tree was dead |
|
UNIT |
None | None | None |
|
PRECISION |
N/A | N/A | Unknown, temporary absence of leaves or presence of Lianas may cause an error in assessment |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
S, L or P |
U - undamaged |
D-time of death undetermined H-tree killed immediately by the hurricane B- trees dead before the hurricane P-trees died after the hurricane (may or may not be related to the hurricane) A-alive trees that appeared dead in the initial hurricane mortality survey. R-tree regenerated after the hurricane and reaching minimum diameter in time to be included in the measurement (exclusively CECSCH). Blank for a living tree. |
|
DATA TYPE |
Alphanumeric | Alphanumeric | Alphanumeric |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
Blank means position not recorded | None, Blank means trees that were assigned from later censuses and were assumed not damaged by Hurricane Hugo. | Blank, means variable does not apply or assessment was not made. |
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
1,2 | 1,2 |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
Sp | Li |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Sprout | Lianas |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Stem had sprouts on the main trunk or top of a snap off. Recorded in Census 1 survey 1. | 50% of the tree crown, not trunk was covered in vines. Recorded in Census 1 survey 1. |
|
UNIT |
None | None |
|
PRECISION |
Not known, based upon an assessment from the ground. | Not known, based upon an assessment from the ground. |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
Sp or blank | Li or blank |
|
DATA TYPE |
Alphanumeric | Alphanumeric |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
Blank means did not apply or assessment not recorded. | Blank means did not apply or assessment not recorded. |
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS:
|
Variable Name |
Formula |
|
Calculation of "Fixed" diameter of stems given in LFDP1a.txt |
1) When two stem diameters are known (Diam at Time2 – Diam at Time1)/ (Time2 – Time1) = Growthrate; Growthrate * (Time1 – Time0 of unknown Diam) = Growth from Time0 of unknown Diam; Unknown Diam at Time0 = Diameter at Time 1 -Growth from Time0 of unknown diameter. 2) When only one diameter is known, substitute the median growthrate for the same species in 1) above. Use the median for the appropriate size class of stems, either >=1,<10 cm or >=10, <=30 cm. 3) If two diameters are known for time 1 and time 2 and the second is smaller than the first i.e. a negative growthrate. Substitute the smallest of the two diameters for the diameter at time 0. |
FOR DATA MANAGER USE ONLY
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
Jan 13, 2005
DATE OF LAST ENTRY: January 30, 1992
STAGE OF DATA SET MANAGEMENT (dates):
RECEIVED ENTERED: 1992
FILED : 1992
ON-LINE; 2002
REVIEWED BY RESEARCHER:
FILING MEDIA:
NAME OF DOCUMENTATION FILE: lterdb46.htm
NAME OF ON - LINE CATALOG: LTERDBAS
RECORD #: 46
DOCUMENT TYPE: magnetic media (paper also)
PRIORITY TO BE ENTERED: second
Rev. date of this form: 8 June 2001