ON-LINE VERSION
A DATA SET is a series of observations collected by the same methodology. Each data set should have documentation sufficient for someone unfamiliar with the research to replicate the study. Data sets may be broken into subsets (data files) that are discrete in space and time, in that order. The documentation for a data set should include all spatial and temporal subdivisions of the data.
(Data, Abstract, Methods, Variables)
NOTES:
| PERSON(S) COMPLETING THIS FORM: | E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
Douglas Schaefer |
dougschaefer@scientist.com |
|
Eda C. Meléndez-Colom |
DATA SET IDENTIFIER: Longterm Intersite Decomposition Experiment (LIDET)
PROJECT TITLE: Long-term Intersite Decomposition Experiment (LIDET)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The LIDET experiment is designed to test the effects of substrate quality and macroclimate on long-term decomposition and nutrient release dynamics of fine litter. Although other factors, such as the decomposer biota, may also influence these long-term dynamics, we felt that substrate quality and macroclimate would explain the largest proportion of the variation and would be the easiest to extrapolate geographically. The role of the decomposer biota is tested indirectly by the LIDET experiment, however, as the litter used was not native to the sites. If there is a large interaction between substrate quality and decomposer biota, then some species of litter may decompose faster or slower than generally expected at some of the sites.
The LIDET decomposition experiments
have been installed at 28 sites that span a wide array of ecosystems, from tundra
to warm desert to shortgrass steppe to moist tropical forest (Table I, Figure
1). Precitpitation ranges from 230 to 4000 mm year1 and mean annual air temperature
ranges from 7-26 C (Figure 2). Although many sites differ markedly in precipitation
and temperature, many are distinguishable only by their seasonal dynamics.
The Konza and Andrews sites, for example, have identical abiotic decomposition
indices (Parton et al. 1987) but distinctly different precipitation patterns,
with winter rainfall at Andrews and summer rainfall at Konza.
LTER CORE AREAS: Annotate all that apply (See online list)
| Organic Matter Accumulation |
| Inorganic Inputs and Nutrient Movements |
LEF LTER 1 RESEARCH TOPIC: (Annotate all that apply) (See online list)
| Litter breakdown |
| Soil organic matter formation |
We define a data file as a component of a data set. A data set can have
only one data file or more. Basically, different data files have different data
structures or format . DATA
SET FILES (SUBSETS):
|
1
|
LIDET | newmass.txt |
September 12, 1990
|
Approx 120 days | April 15, 1993 |
RESEARCH
LOCATION: In Puerto Rico: At 350m near the El Verde Field Station in the Tabonuco
Forest
INVESTIGATORS:
| D. Jean Lodge | dlodge@fs.fed.us |
Douglas Schaefer |
dougschaefer@scientist.com |
|
Mark Harmon |
|
D. Jean Lodge |
(787) 889-7445 |
SOURCE OF FUNDING (SPONSOR): NSF-LTER and NSF-LIDET
DATA SET ABSTRACT: LIDET is the LTER Longterm Intersite Decomposition Experiment Team. It is a leaf, wood, and root decomposition study carried out at 28 LTER and other sites including LUQ. The duration of the study is designed to be approximately 10 yrs at temperate zone sites and approximately 3 yrs at tropical zone sites because of higher decomposition rates there. The same decomposing materials, litter bags, and study design are used at all sites to facilitate intersite comparisons.
Not all species were used at all sites.Six leaf litter species were used extensively at all sites that cover a range of leaf quality to permit a comparison of effects of litter quality and climate on decomposition.The others were present in the study as "wild cards", with at least one species contributed by each site. Three species of roots, and one species of wood were used.DATA SET METHODS: Leaves were placed in mesh bags with 0.1 mm lower holes and either 1 or 7 mm upper holes. Roots were all in 0.1 mm mesh bags. Leaves and root bags were placed under the soil surface litter layer. Wood was commercial 1/4 inch dowels inserted halfway into the ground to measure both aboveground and belowground decomposition rates. All materials were placed in the field at the same time. At each sampling period, 4 replicates of each assigned type were collected and sent to Oregon State University for processing. At LUQ, litter was field exposed at 350 m elevation in Tabonuco forest type near the El Verde Field Station.
REFERENCES:
Aber,
J.D., J.M. Melillo, and C.A. McClaugherty. 1990. Predicting long-term patterns
of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial
fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 68: 2201-2208
Berg, B., G. Ekbohm, and C.A. McClaugherty.1984. Lignin and holocellulose relations
during long-term decomposition of some forest litters. Long-term decomposition
in a Scots pine forest.IV. Can. I. Bot. 62: 25402550>
Berg, B., and H. Staaf. 1981.Leaching, accumulation and release of nitrogen
in decomposing forest litter. Pages 163-178 in F.E. Clark and T. Rosswal, eds.
Terrestrial Nitrogen Cycles. Ecol. Bull. Vol. 33. Swedish Natural Science Research
Council, Stockhom, Sweden
Bunnell, F.L., and D.E.N. Tait. 1977. Microbial respiration and substrate loss. II. A model of the influences of chemical composition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9: 41-47
Bunnell, F.L., D.E.N. Tait, P.W. Flanagan, and K.Van Cleve.1977. Microbial respiration
and substrate loss.I. A general model of the influences of abiotic factors.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 9: 33-40
Edmonds R. L. 1984. Long-term decomposition and nutrient dynamics in Pacific
silver fir needles in western Washington.Can. J. For. Res. 14: 395-400
Foge, R., and K. Cromach, Jr. 1977. Effect of habitat and substrate quality
on Douglas-fir litter decomposition in western Oregon. Can. I. Bot.55: 1632-1640
Heath, G.W., C.A. Edwards, and M.K. Arnold. 1964. Some methods for assessing
the activity of soil animals in the breakdown of leaves. Pedobiologica 4: 80-87.
Houghton, R.A., J.E. Hobbie, J.M. Melillo, B. Moore, B.J. Peterson, G.R. Shaver,
and G.M. Woodwell. 1983. Changes in carbon content of terrestrial biota and
soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere.
Ecol.Monogr. 53: 235-262
Howard, P.J.A., and D.M.Howard. 1974. Microbial decomposition of tree and shrub
litter. I. Weight loss and chemical composition of decomposing litter. Oikos
25: 314-352
International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). 1990. The International
Geosphere-Biophere Programme; study of global change. The Initial Core Projects. IGBP Rep. 12. Stockholm, Sweden
Jansson, P.E., and B. Berg. 1985. Temporal variation of litter decomposition
in relation to simulated soil climate: long-term decomposition in a Scots pine
forest. Can. J. Bot. 63: 1008-1016
Kurcheva, G.F. 1960. The role of invertebrates in the decomposition of oak litter.
Pedology, Leningrad 4: 16-23.
Lousier, J.D., and D. Parkinson.1978. Chemical element dynamics in decomposing
leaf litter. Can. J. Bot. 56: 2795-2812
Lubchenco, J., A. M. Olson, L. B. Brubaker, S. R. Carpenter, M. J. Holland,
S. P. Hubbel, S. A. Levin, J. A. MacMahon, P.A. Matson, J. M. Melillo, H.A. Mooney, C. H. Peterson, H.R. Pulliam, L. A. Real, P.J. Regal, and P.G. Risser. 1991. The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology
72: 371-412
McClaugherty, C. A., J. Pastor, J. D. Aber, and J. M. Melillo.1985. Forest
litter decomposition in relation to soil nitrogen dynamics and litter quality. Ecology 66: 266-275
Parton, W. J., D. S. Schimel, C. V. Cole, and D. S. Ojima. 1987. Analysis of
factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1173-1179
Rasteter, E., M. G. Ryan, G.R. Shaver, J.M. Melillo, K. J. Nadelhoffer, J.E. Hobbie, and J.D. Aber. 1991. A general biogeochemical model describing the response
of the C and N cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to changes in CO2 climate,
and N deposition. Tree Physiology 9: 101-126
Ryan, M.G., J.M. Melillo, and A. Ricca. 1990. A comparison of methods for determining
proximate carbon fractions forest litter. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 166-171
Swift, M.J., O.W. Heal, and J.M. Anderson. 1979. Decomposition in Terrestrial
Ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles
Vogt, K. A., C.C. Grier, and D.J.Vogt. 1986. Production, turnover, and nutrient
dynamics of above-and below-ground detritus of world forests. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15: 303-377
Wessman, C.A., J.D. Aber, D.L. Peterson, and J.M. Melillo. 1988a. Foliar analysis
using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 6-11
___________. 1988b.Remote sensing of canopy chemistry and nitrogen cycling in
temperate forest ecosystems. Nature 335: 154-156
Witkamp, M., and J.S. Olson. 1963. Breakdown of confined and nonconfined oak
litter. Oikos 14: 138-147
CROSS-REFERENCES
(other data sets related to this one): LTERDBAS
93, 94, 95, 98, 111, 115
SAMPLE LOCATION: Forestry Science Laboratory, Oregon State University
STORAGE SITES(of data files): Data Managent's File Cabinet DM-002 Drawer# 1; Forestry Science Laboratory, Oregon State University
INVESTIGATOR'S ASSIGNED KEYWORDS: litter decomposition, soil organic matter, nutrient fluxes, LTER
LEF LTER OFFICIAL KEYWORDS (See table): EL VERDE, TABONUCO, CLIMATE, CATIONS AND ANIONS, GAS EXCHANGE, RAINFALL, PEER REVIEWED DATA SET
RESTRICTED ___ UNRESTRICTED _X _
REASONS TO RESTRICT DATA IN THIS DATA SET BEYOND ITS TWO YEAR POLICY PERIOD*:
*WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY AT LEAST ONE LUQ LTER PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: N. Brokaw, J. ZIMMERMAN, A. LUGO
___ "File" copy only:Data Management will only file an electronic
copy of the data file and its documentation
___ " Enter" data on-line:Data Management will be in charge of entering
the data on computer files (Contact Eda
C. Meléndez)
Geographical positional system (GPS) Coordinates for each location:
|
location |
latitude |
longitude |
|
At 350m near the El Verde Field Station in the Tabonuco Forest |
18° 19" 21' N |
65° 49" 13' W |
|
File Name or # above (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 | 1 | 1 |
|
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file) |
ID |
LRW |
A/B/L/R |
SP |
|
Sample ID |
Leaf/Root/Wood |
Decomposed Above/Decomposed Below/Leaf/Root |
Species code |
|
| Sample ID number assigned by OSU. No data is missing for this field. | Sample is leaf, root or wood. No data is missing for this field. | Sample was decomposed above- or below-ground, leaf or root. No data is missing for this field. | Four letter species code usually having the first two letters from the genus and last two from the species, all in capital letters. No data is missing for this field. | |
| ABCO = Abies concolor, ABLA = Abies lasiocarpa, ACCI = Acer circinatum, ACMA = Acer macrophyllum, ACSA = Acer saccharum; sugar maple, AMBR = Ammophia breviligulata; beach grass, ANGE = Schizachyrium gerardi; big blue stem, ANSC = Schizachyrium scoparium; little blue stem, BELU = Betula lutea; yellow birch, BOER = Boutloua eriopoda; black gramma, BOGR = Boutloua gracilis; blue gramma, CEGR = Ceanothus greggii, CONU = Cornus nuttalii; pacific dogwood, DRGL = Drypetes glauca, FAGR = Fagus grandifolia; beech, GOBA = Gonystyus bancanus; ramin, GYLU = Gymnantes lucida, KOMY = Kobresia myosuroides, LATR = Larrea tridentata; creosote bush, LITU = Liriodendron tulipifera; yellow poplar, MYCE = Myrica cerifer; wax myrtle, PIEL = Pinus elliotii; slash pine, PIMO = Pinus monticola, PIRE = Pinus resinosa; red pine, PIST = Pinus strobus; eastern white pine, POTR = Populus tremuloides; aspen, PSTD = pine needle standard, PSME = Pseudotsuga menziesii; douglas-fir, QUPR = Quercus prinus; chestnut oak, RHMA = Rhododendron macrophyllum; pacific rhododendron, ROPS = Robinea pseudoacacia; black locust, SPAL = Spartina alternifolia; salt water cordgrass, THPL = Thuja plicata; western red cedar, TRAE = Triticum aestivum; wheat, VOFE = Vochysia ferragenea | ||||
|
numeric |
alphanumeric |
alphanumeric |
alphabetic |
|
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
File Name or # above (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 | 1 | 1 |
|
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file) |
DATE1 |
DATE2 |
INTERVAL |
YRS |
| Date placed | Date removed | Sampling interval | Exposure period | |
|
Date (in format mm/dd/yyyy) when sample was placed in field. No data is missing for this field. |
Date (in format mm/dd/yy) when sample was removed from field. No data is missing for this field. |
Interval of time in years during which sampling was removed from field. No data is missing for this field. |
Period of sample field in years exposure. No data is missing for this field. |
|
| years | ||||
|
1-10 |
0.31-2.59 |
|||
datetime |
datetime |
integer |
datetime |
|
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
File Name or # above (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 | 1 | 1 |
|
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file) |
REP |
MESH |
IADW |
IODW |
| Sample replicate number | Mesh opening size | Initial air dry weight | Initial oven dry weight | |
|
Replicate number of sample. No data is missing for this field. |
Mesh opening size of litter bag. When datum is missing field is left blank or it has a period. |
Initial air dry weight of sample. No data is missing for this field. |
Initial oven dry weight of sample. No data is missing for this field. |
|
|
millimeter |
gram |
gram |
||
| 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
|
1-4 |
0.1, 1, 7, . = missing datum |
|||
|
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
|
|
|
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
File
Name or # above (all in which the variable appears) 1 AbbreviationAbbreviation(as
it appears on the data file) FWW FODW LENGTH IADW1 Final
wet weight of sample. When datum is missing field is left blank. Final
organic matter dry weight of sample. When datum is missing field is left blank. Length
of wooden dowel sample. When datum is missing field is left blank. Initial
air dry weight of wooden dowel sample. When datum is missing field is left blank. gram gram centimeter gram numeric numeric numeric numeric
1
1
=1
Final
wet weight
Final
organic matter dry weigh
Length
of wooden dowel
Initial
air dry weight of wooden dowel
0.01
0.001
0.1
0.001
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
File Name or # above (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 | 1 |
1 |
|
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file) |
IODW1 |
IASH% |
FASH% |
IAFW |
| Initial oven dry weight of wooden dowe | Initial percent ash content | Final percent ash content | Initial ash free dry weight | |
Initial oven dry weight of wooden dowel sample. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
Percent ash content before field exposure. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
Percent ash content after field exposure. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
Initial ash free dry weight. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
|
gram |
|
|
gram |
|
| 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
|
VARIABLES (ATTRIBUTES):
|
File Name or # above (all in which the variable appears) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
AbbreviationAbbreviation(as it appears on the data file) |
FAFW |
PRM% |
PAFRM% |
KDW |
KAFW |
|
Final ash free dry weight |
Percent of initial mass remaining |
Percent of initial ash free mass remaining |
Decay constant on dry weight basis |
Decay constant on ash free weight basis |
|
|
Final ash free dry weight. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
Percent of initial mass remaining. When datum is missing field is left blank.. |
Percent of initial ash free mass remaining. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
Decay constant on dry weight basis per years. Formula used to calculate it is kdw = natural log (prm%)/interval. When datum is missing field is left blank. |
Decay constant on ash free weight basis per years. Formula used to calculate it is kafw = natural log (pafrm%)/interval When datum is missing field is left blank. |
|
|
gram |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
|
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS:
|
kdw |
kdw = natural log (prm%)/interval |
|
kafw |
kafw = natural log (pafrm%)/interval |
FOR DATA MANAGER USE ONLY
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: April 24, 2009
DATE OF LAST ENTRY:
STAGE OF DATA SET MANAGEMENT (dates):
RECEIVED ENTERED:
FILED ON-LINE
REVIEWED BY RESEARCHER: January, 2002
FILING MEDIA:
NAME OF DOCUMENTATION FILE: lterdb89.htm
NAME OF ON - LINE CATALOG: LTERDBAS
RECORD #: 89
DOCUMENT TYPE: computer media
PRIORITY TO BE ENTERED: N/A
Rev. Date of this form: 28 July 200/ 15 July 2001/June 9, 2003/March 16, 2004/12 April 2005/ 8 November 2005/ 16 January 2006