LUQ LTER DATA SETS DOCUMENTATION FORM
ON-LINE VERSION
A DATA SET is a series of observations collected by the same methodology. Each data set should have documentation sufficient for someone unfamiliar with the research to replicate the study. Data sets may be broken into subsets (data files) that are discrete in space and time, in that order. The documentation for a data set should include all spatial and temporal subdivisions of the data.
(Data, Abstract, Methods, Variables)
NOTES:
PERSON(S) COMPLETING THIS FORM: E-MAIL ADDRESS:
| Kristiina Vogt | kvogt@u.washington.edu |
|
Eda C. Melendez-Colom |
DATA SET IDENTIFIER: Aboveground litterfall data at Bisley
PROJECT TITLE: Nutrient Cycling in Tabonuco Forest (MRCE/LTER Litterfall Nutrient Fluxes, and Extractable Soil versus Microbial Biomass Nitrogen)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Understanding the long-term impact of deforestation on ecosystem structure and function of tropical forests may aid in designing future conservation programs to preserve biodiversity and sustain ecosystem productivity. We examined forest structure, tree species composition, litterfall (fine and coarse) due to Hurricane Hugo and subsequent fine annual litterfall inputs, litterfall rate, and leaf litter decomposition. The experiment was initiated by the MRCE (Minortity Research Centers of Excellence) program, and continued by the LTER. In addition to measuring nutrient fluxes from litterfall and decomposition, we measured KCl-extractable soil nitrogen in ammonium and nitrate forms to determine the effects of complete fertilization and removal of hurricane debris.
History of litterfall, decomposition and soil nitrogen availability studies (MRCE experiment) at the Luquillo Experimental Forest (LEF):
The Minority Research Centers of Excellence (MRCE) experiment was designed originally to determine whether forest productivity was limited by nutrient availability, genetic constraints or climatic variables along a steep environmental gradient in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. Comparisons were made between dwarf forest at 500 m elev. and tabonuco forest from 300-400 m elev. There were two main experiments in the original design: 1) forest fertilization (complete versus none); 2) transplant experiments using common gardens at high and low elevation, with and without wind protection at high elevation. In addition, phenology of leaves was studied in the dwarf forest to determine the longevity of leaves in the canopy.
Hurricane Hugo struck in September 1989, following a year of pre-treatment measurements and just as the forest plot fertilization experiments were to begin, and deposited a year and a half of annual above ground litter inputs of phosphorus on the forest floor in green leaf litter (Lodge et al. 1991). As phosphorus is thought to be the most limiting element, this necessitated the addition of a hurricane debris-removal treatment as a second type of control in the lower elevation tabonuco forest. Furthermore, the hurricane changed the nature of the study into one of looking at changes in forest composition and the recovery of forest productivity in response to fertilization and hurricane debris-removal. Seedling, sapling, herbaceous plant, and fern responses, as well as measurements of light availability and canopy closure were added to the originally planned measurements of tree diameter growth, leaf litter production, and fine root production and turnover. Funding for continued studies of the MRCE plots ended in 1998, but they were of such great value as a long-term experiment that they were incorporated into the LTER program. Another hurricane in 1998 (Hurricane Georges) presented an opportunity to look at the effects of removing only the woody debris (in new plots) versus removing all hurricane debris.
The leaf decomposition experiment was originally designed to examine short-term disappearance of foliage from three important montane species: Prestoea montana (R. Grah.) Nichols, Dacryodes excelsa (Vahl.), and Cyrilla racemiflora. Hurricane Hugo (August, 1989) provided a unique opportunity to study effects of this type of natural disturbance on decomposition. The study was repeated in 1990 as part of the LTER, with some changes in the design that allowed for comparisons of short -term foliar litter biomass and nitrogen dynamics: (1) among the three species, (between the colorado and tabonuco forest types, (3) between riparian and upland sites, and (4) between pre- and post-hurricane environments.
LTER CORE AREAS: (Annotate all that apply)
| Primary Productivity |
|
Organic Matter Accumulation |
LEF LTER 1 RESEARCH TOPIC: (Annotate all that apply)
| Disturbance regime |
|
Recovery after disturbance |
We define a data file as a component of a data set. A data set can have
only one data file or more. Basically, different data files have different data
structures or format.
DATA SET FILES (SUBSETS):
|
Data File No. |
Data File Identifier |
On-Line Filename |
Starting Date |
Periodicity of sample |
End Period |
|
1
|
Bisley Aboveground litterfall 1989-1992 data | abov8992.txt | August 28, 1989 | every 2-4 weeks | May 18, 1992 |
|
2
|
Bisley Aboveground litterfall 1994-1995 data | abov9495.txt | June 13, 1994 | every 2-4 weeks | June 6, 1995 |
See Web site at Yale for results in table format: belowground litter transfers along topographic gradients , aboveground litter transfers along topographic gradients
RESEARCH LOCATION: La Prieta, El Verde and Bisley #3, Bisley, Puerto Rico
INVESTIGATORS:
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS E-MAIL address
| Kristiina Vogt | kvogt@u.washington.edu |
| Daniel Vogt | dvogt@u.washington.edu |
| Tom Siccama | Thomas.Siccama@yale.edu |
| Alan Covich | alanc@cnr.colostate.edu |
| Fred Scatena | fns@sas.upenn.edu |
OTHER RESEARCHERS E-MAIL address
|
Xiao-Yun Wang |
|
| Paul Boon | paul.boon@vu.edu.au |
| Janine Bloomfield | |
| John Ranciato | |
| Javier Perez |
CONTACT PERSONS E-MAIL address Phone Number (Include area code)
| Kristiina Vogt | kvogt@u.washington.edu | (203) 432-5076 |
|
Daniel Vogt |
(203) 432-5076 |
SOURCE OF FUNDING (SPONSOR): NSF Ecosystem Program, Andrew W. Mellon
Foundation, and NSF-LTER
DATA SET ABSTRACT: Litterfall (fine and coarse) due
to Hurricane Hugo and subsequent fine annual litterfall inputs (1, 2 and 5 yr
after Hugo) were determined for two sites (El Verde and Bisley) in the Luquillo
Experimental Forest in Puerto Rico. Litter transfers into streams, riparian
and upslope areas were determined within each catchment. The recovery rate of
aboveground fine litterfall (leaf, fine wood <1 cm diameter, and other miscellaneous
inputs) to predisturbance levels were determined 1, 2, and 5 yr after Hurricane
Hugo. The amount of total litter transfers and their individual components into
the riparian and upslope areas due to Hurricane Hugo varied significantly by
catchments within the Luquillo Experimental Forest. At El Verde, 26-39%, 31-
35%, 14-35% and 7-12% of the total litter transfers were contributed by leaf
litter, fine wood, coarse wood and fine roots, respectively. At Bisley, 28-31%,
26-29%, 33-35% and 8-10% of the litter transfers were contributed by the same
categories. Differential decay rates contributed to the relative importance
of fine and coarse litter inputs. The recovery of fine aboveground litterfall
to pre-hurricane levels after 5 yr varied by topographic location (streams had
the slowest recovery, upslope areas the highest) and catchment (El Verde: 55-77%;
Bisley: 39-82% of pre-hurricane values).
DATA SET METHODS: This study was conducted in
a Tabonuco forest type classified as a subtropical wet forest in the Luquillo
Experimental Forest in northeastern Puerto Rico. The dominant tree species was
Dacroydes excelsa with Prestoea montana and Sloanea berteriana as commonly associated
species (Brown et al. 1983). Soils were classified as clay and silty clay loam
ultisols in the Los Guineos soil series (Boccheciamp 1977). Annual rainfall
is approximately 3600 mm with the drier periods typically occurring between
January and April (Brown et al. 1983). Mean monthly air temperatures are relatively
constant throughout the year with lows of 21C in December-January, and highs
of 24C between July-September. These forest types are described in greater detail
in Brown et al. (1983), Scatena (1989) and Zou et al.(1995).
Plots were established in two separate catchments - one catchment was located
at El Verde adjacent to the La Prieta stream (350-430 m elevation) and the other
at Bisley on the # 3 gaged watershed (230-455 m elevation). Within each catchment
three topographic areas were selected: (1) stream pools, (2) riparian zones
and (3) the upslope area. The riparian zone is an area adjacent to the stream
that is periodically flooded and characterized by mottling in the soil. During
year 1 and 2, five replicate plots (10x10 m) were established within each topographic
area of each catchment, resulting in 15 plots in each catchment. During year
5, only three replicate plots (15x30 m) were established in each topographic
area of each catchment, resulting in 9 plots per catchment. The riparian plot
was located immediately adjacent to the stream plot and the upslope plot was
either immediately adjacent to or within 30 m of the riparian plot. The upslope
plot was not located on a ridge. The sampling area in the Bisley #3 catchment
included a 200 m long stream reach while the area at El Verde's La Prieta included
a 100 m long stream reach. The plots were systematically located within that
100-200 m reach of each stream with a minimum distance of 30 m between plots
to ensure their adequate interspersion while conserving some randomness (Krebs
1989). For example, the requisite number of deep stream pools were found along
each selected stream reach and used as the stream plots. The riparian and upslope
plots were then positioned perpendicular to the stream and near the stream plots.
Plots were interspersed in each catchment to avoid spatial autocorrelation.
Litterfall collectors were then randomly positioned within the plots. The plots
varied somewhat in aspect and slope (Bisley had steeper slopes than El Verde)
within each catchment.
Litterfall in the riparian and upslope plots was sampled using plastic laundry
baskets (1,444 cm2 collection surface area - 29 cm deep and 38x38 cm wide at
the open top) which were lined with fiberglass window screening (1 mm size openings).
The baskets had large holes punched in the bottom to ensure that water drained
from them. Plants that were 50 cm or taller were the only plants that contributed
to the sampled litterfall. Litterfall occurring in the stream plots was sampled
using a rectangular litterfall collector (30,000 cm2 collection surface area
- 244 cm long, 122 cm wide and 61 cm deep), made of inert plastic mesh (1 mm
size openings) and suspended ~ 1-2 m above the stream pool. During the first
two years, two terrestrial litterfall collectors were placed in each of the
five upslope and riparian plots for a total of 10 collectors at each of those
topographic positions per catchment. However during the fifth year, five litterfall
collectors were placed in each of the upslope and riparian plots but only three
plots were established per topographic position per catchment for a total of
15 collectors at each topographic positions per catchment. For the stream plots
only 1 stream litterfall collector was used in each of the five stream plots
in each catchment during year 1 and 2 making a total of 5 stream litterfall
collectors per catchment. However during the fifth year (as with the riparian
and upslope plots) only 3 plots were established but 2 stream litterfall collectors
per plot were erected making a total of 6 stream litterfall collectors per catchment.
Litterfall mass (g/m2) was recorded in these data files for specific dates (i.e.,
sampling time). However, for the summarization in the abstract these data were
converted to monthly litterfall mass (g/m2) which were estimated by determining
the number of days between a litterfall collection date (e.g., 'date=2') and
the prior collection date (e.g., 'date=1'), divide the litterfall mass of 'date=2'
by 'days since prior collection date' to calculate the 'estimated mass/day',
then sum 'estimated daily mass' within each month for the 'estimated monthly
mass'. The numerical manipulation and statistics were accomplished using Microsoft
Excel for Windows v. 7.0a, Microsoft FoxPro v. 2.5 and The Sas System for Windows
v. 6.11.
REFERENCES:
Anderson, J.M. and J.S.I. Ingram. 1996. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility
- A handbook of Methods. CAB International. Wallingford, UK.
Boccheciamp, R.A. 1977. Soil survey of the Humacao area of eastern Puerto Rico. USDA Soil Cons. Serv., U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.
Brown, S., A.E. Lugo, S. Silander, and L. Liegel. 1983. Research history and opportunities in the Luquillo Experimental Forest. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-44. New Orleans, Louisiana.
Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New York.
Scatena, F.N. 1989. An introduction to the physiography and history of the Bisley Experimental Watersheds in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-72. New Orleans, Louisiana.
Zou, X., C.P. Zucca, R.B. Waide, and W.H. McDowell. 1995. Long- term influence of deforestation on tree species composition and litter dynamics of a tropical rain forest in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecol. and Management 78:147-157.
CROSS-REFERENCES (other data sets related to this one): LTERDBAS#51: MRCE/LTER Soil and Microbial Biomass Nitrogen; LTERDBAS #93: Litter decomposition in tabonuco forest before Hugo; LTERDBAS #94: Litterfall of the tabonuco forest before Hurricane Hugo; LTERDBAS #95: Litterfall along topographic gradients at lower Bisley; LTERDBAS #111: Litterfall in tabonuco (subtropical wet) forest in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico (MRCE Litterfall data); LTERDBAS #115: Short-term disappearance of foliar litter of three tree species native to rain forest of Puerto Rico
SAMPLE LOCATION: Yale University, School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Greeley Memorial Lab, 370 Prospect St., New Haven, CT 06511, USA, Basement Room 6
STORAGE SITES: Yale University, School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Greeley Memorial Lab, 370 Prospect St., New Haven, CT 06511, USA, Room 212 computer room. Data on 3 1/2 floppy disk in storage container labeled Puerto Rico Data on shelf and on hard disk drive (C:\Puerto Rico) of Dell XPS computer. ITES, Data Manager's File DM-001 , Drawer #2
INVESTIGATOR'S ASSIGNED KEYWORDS: litter transfers, litterfall, Hurricane Hugo, Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico, LUQ LTER site, stream, riparian and upslope areas, wood, leaf and miscellaneous tree tissues, tropical forest
LEF LTER OFFICIAL KEYWORDS (See table): BISLEY, EL VERDE, RIPARIAN, STREAM, TABONUCO, HURRICANE, LITTER FALL, SECOND FOREST, TREES, PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL
PUBLICATIONS:
Vogt, K.A., D.J. Vogt, P.Boon, A. Covich, F. N. Scatena, H. Asbjornsen, J.L.
O'Hara, J. Pérez, T.G. Siccama, J. Bloomfield, J.F. Ranciato. 1997. Litter
dynamics along stream, riparian and upslope areas following Hurricane Hugo,
Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Biotropica 28(4a):458-470.
DISSEMINATION: UNRESTRICTED
REASONS TO RESTRICT DATA IN THIS DATA SET BEYOND ITS TWO YEAR POLICY PERIOD*:
*WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY LTER PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: N. BROKAW, A. LUGO
SITES DESCRIPTIONS:
Geographical positional system (GPS) Coordinates for each location:
|
location |
latitude |
longitude |
| El Verde | ||
| La Prieta | ||
| Bisley #3 |
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
All | All | All | All |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
DATE | SITE | PLOT | LOCATION |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Point in time | Location-site | Plot | Topographic position location |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Point in time (in mm/dd/yyyy) when litterfall collectors were sampled. No data is missing in this field. |
Watershed code for research location-site. No data is missing in this field. |
Code number of plot. No data is missing in this field. |
Topographic position location. No data is missing in this field. |
|
UNIT |
||||
|
PRECISION |
||||
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
|
1 = El Verde, |
1 = stream pools; lowest downstrem, 2 = riparian zones; middle plot, 3 = the upslope area; upstream |
1-16 |
|
DATA TYPE |
datetime | integer |
integer |
integer |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
VARIABLES:
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
All | All | All | All |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
REPLICATE | LEAVES | WOOD | RACHIS |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Replicate plots | Biomass of leaves | Biomass of woody plant materials | Biomass of palm rachis |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Replicate plots (10x10 m) that were established within each topographic area of each catchment, resulting in 15 plots in each catchment during year 1 and 2 and during year 5, three replicate plots (15x30 m) that were established in each topographic area of each catchment, resulting in 9 plots per catchment. No data is missing in htis field. | Biomass of leaves dried at 70C (g/m2) (grams of litterfall leaves divided by the area of the litterfall). A bkank appears when data was not collected. | Biomass of woody plant materials < 1 cm (grams of litterfall wood divided by the area of the litterfall). A bkank appears when data was not collected. | Biomass of palm rachis (central stalk of the compund leaf of the palm) (grams of litterfall rachis, divided by the area of the litterfall). A bkank appears when data was not collected. |
|
UNIT |
gramsPerSquareMeter | gramsPerSquareMeter | gramsPerSquareMeter | |
|
PRECISION |
0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | |||
|
DATA TYPE |
numeric |
numeric |
numeric |
|
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
VARIABLES:
|
FILE NAME OR #ABOVE (all in which the variable appears) |
All | All |
|
ABBREVIATION (as it appears on the data file) |
OTHER | TOTAL |
|
NAME OF VARIABLE |
Biomass of others litterfall materials | Biomass of total litterfall materials |
|
DEFINITION OF VARIABLE |
Biomass of others (e.g. seeds, fruits, flowers, non-identifiable, etc.) (grams of other litterfall divided by the area of the litterfall). A bkank appears when data was not collected. | Biomass of total (sum of leaves, wood, rachis, and others). A blank appears when data was not collected. |
|
UNIT |
gramsPerSquareMeter | gramsPerSquareMeter |
|
PRECISION |
0.01 | 0.01 |
|
RANGE OR LIST OF VALUES |
||
|
DATA TYPE |
numeric |
numeric |
|
MISSING DATA CODES |
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS:
| Variable Name | Formula |
| Wood |
Collectors - dry mass of litterfall wood (g) / area of collector (m2) = litterfall mass (g) / m2 |
| Ranchis | Collectors - dry mass of litterfall ranchis (g) / area of collector (m2) = litterfall mass (g) / m2 |
| Other |
Collectors - dry mass of other litterfall (g) / area of collector (m2) = litterfall mass (g) / m2 |
|
Total |
Leaves+Wood+Rachis+Other |
FOR DATA MANAGER USE ONLY
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
May 3, 2009
DATE OF LAST ENTRY: 1993
STAGE OF DATA SET MANAGEMENT (dates):
RECEIVED: 13 May 1997
CATALOGUED: 28 May 1997
ON-LINE: 28 May 1997
REVIEWED BY RESEARCHER: 13 May 1997
FILING MEDIA:
NAME OF DOCUMENTATION FILE: LTERDB95.FM*
NAME OF DATA FILE: abov8992.txt, abov992.txt
NAME OF ON - LINE CATALOG: LTERDBAS
RECORD #: 95
DOCUMENT TYPE: magnetic media only
PRIORITY TO BE ENTERED: N/A
Rev. date of this form: 18 March 2002